Author: S Al Laham | Size: 1.6 MB | Format:PDF | Publisher: British Energy Generation | Year: 1998 | pages: 224
This report provides a collation of stress intensity factor and limit load solutions for defective components. It includes the Stress Intensity Factor (SIFs) in the R6 Code software and in other computer programs, which have not previously been contained in a single source reference. This document has been produced as part of the BRITE-URAM project SINTAP which aims to develop a defect assessment approach for the European Community. Most of the solutions presented in this document were collated from industry and establishments in the UK (Nuclear Electric Ltd, Magnox Electric Plc and HSE), Sweden (SAQ Kontroll AB) and Germany (Fraunhofer IWM, and GKSS). The solutions are compared to standard solutions published elsewhere and to those in the American Petroleum Institute document API 579. In this second issue, the quality of the figures has been improved, minor typographical errors found in the previous issue have been corrected, and comments from partners in SINTAP have been addressed.
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
Construction of soil and aggregate layers on steep slopes or over potential voids is becoming more common in many areas of the country. This is because the construction of new waste containment and liquid impoundment facilities and the expansion or closing of old waste facilities has become environmentally necessary to assure protection of groundwater supplies. Often these facilities must be designed to maximize storage volume, creating steep slopes, or to overcome inadequate foundation conditions, including foundation voids, while incorporating the best available containment technology. Thus designers are commonly faced with assuring the integrity and stability of sophisticated containment systems constructed on steep slopes and over void-prone foundations.
To assure optimal performance, state-of-the-art waste containment systems commonly include both conventional soil materials as well as geosynthetics. Yet, system instability or damage may result when soil - geosynthetic layers are placed on a steep slope or over a void. Reinforcing these soil layers provides a cost effective means to achieve long-term stability of soil - geosynthetic lining systems.
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
Author: Klaas Jan Bakker | Size: 8.3 MB | Format:PDF | Publisher: Taylor & Francis | Year: 2000 | pages: 236 | ISBN: 9789058093219
Models for structural analysis are needed in order to design safe and reliable soil-retaining structures. This study evaluates numerical models, mostly based on finite element techniques. This book provides a frame of reference for verification and validation of these models.
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
Please Upload these pappers if anyone has access to them :
1.Sabelli R., Pottebaum, W., Dean, B. (2009). “Diaphragms for seismic loading,” Structural Engineer, Part 1, January, pp. 24-29, Part 2, February 2009, pp. 22-23.
2.Rodriguez, M.E., Restrepo, J.I., and Blandón, J.J. (2007). “Seismic design forces for rigid floor diaphragms in precast concrete building structures,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 133 (11) November 2007, pp. 1604-1615.
3.Nakaki, S.D. (2000). “Design guidelines for precast and cast-in-place concrete diaphragms,” EERI professional fellowship report, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA.
4.Corley, W.G., Cluff, L., Hilmy, S., Holmes, W., Wight, J. (1996). “Concrete parking structures,” Northridge Report Vol. 2, Earthquake Spectra, V. 11, Supplement C, pp. 75-98.
5.SEAOC (2009). “Concrete parking structures,” The SEAOC Blue Book: seismic design recommendations, Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento
Numerous applications of rod structures in civil engineering, aircraft and spacecraft confirm the importance of the topic. On the other hand the majority of books on structural mechanics use some simplifying hypotheses; these hypotheses do not allow to consider some important effects, for instance the boundary layer effects near the points of junction of rods. So the question concerning the limits of applicability of structural mechanics hypotheses and the possibilities of their refinement arise. In this connection the asymptotic analysis of equations of mathematical physics, the equations of elasticity in rod structures (without these hypotheses and simplifying assumptions being imposed) is undertaken in the present book. Moreover, a lot of modern structures are made of composite materials and therefore the material of the rods is not homogeneous. This inhomogeneity of the material can generate some unexpected effects. These effects are analysed in this book. The methods of multi-scale modelling are presented by the homogenization, multi-level asymptotic analysis and the domain decomposition. These methods give an access to a new class of hybrid models combining macroscopic description with "microscopic zooms".
Content Level » Research
Related subjects » Dynamical Systems & Differential Equations - Mathematics - Mechanics
TABLE OF CONTENTS
From the contents
Introduction: Basic Notions and Methods.- Heterogeneous rods.- Heterogeneous Plate.- Finite Rod Structures.- Lattice Structures.- The Multi-Scale Domain Decomposition.- References. Subject Index.
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
Author: J. S. Przemieniecki | Size: 21.3 MB | Format:PDF | Publisher: D over Pu ications | Year: 1985 | pages: 480 | ISBN: 0486649482
Pioneering text unsurpassed in the treatment of many topics; available first time in paperback. Invaluable for structural engineers and graduate students. 170 illus.
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
The report is intended to make earthquake engineers familiar with the main methods and computational tools needed for developing scenarios of earthquake ground motions and of ensuing damage to representative urban Infrastructure Systems (IS), as well as with illustrative examples of application to cities in Europe and neighbouring countries. The material illustrated is the outcome of the work carried out in LESSLOSS Sub-Project SP11, devoted to the title subject. Of main concern are the water and natural gas distribution networks and the sewage networks, because these are, with the transportation network, by far the most extensive IS in cities and, especially the first one, often the most vulnerable. Also, emphasis is placed more on the tools for achieving a scenario and on their application, rather than on the economic loss evaluation. As a partial justification of the belated development and interest in seismic IS damage, it is recalled that destructive earthquakes of recent decades in Europe did not cause large scale damage to IS. In addition to describing tools for the practical construction of damage scenarios for IS, the report also highlights some innovative research trends in the field, especially the methods leading to the estimation of pipeline damage on the basis of the peak ground strains generated by the propagation of seismic waves, which in turn needs the support of advanced 2D or 3D wave propagation modelling.
The main sections of the report are devoted to:
- Calculation of seismic ground motions in an area, both of advanced and simplified engineering level, with applications for Thessaloniki and Düzce (Sect 2);
- Outline of the buried pipelines response during earthquakes, illustrating the chief elements at play on the side of the seismic loading effects and typical damage (Sect. 3);
- Vulnerability representations for IS components, mostly those consisting of buried pipelines (Sect. 4);
- Typical features of IS inventories, with examples (Sect 5);
- Damage evaluation tools at urban scenario and single pipeline level (Sect. 6);
- Damage scenario applications for Thessaloniki and Düzce (Sect 7);
- Conclusions.
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
The overall aim of Sub-Project 10 (Earthquake disaster scenario predictions and loss modelling for urban areas) has been to create a tool, based on state-of-the-art loss modelling software, to provide strong, quantified statements about the benefits of a range of possible mitigation actions, in order to support decision-making by urban authorities for seismic risk mitigation strategies. A further larger aim has been to contribute to a seismic risk mitigation policy for future implementation at European level. Among the European cities for which loss estimation studies have been carried out are Istanbul, Lisbon and Thessaloniki, and tools, using GIS mapping, have been developed by research teams in each of these cities; these were made available for further development to examine mitigation strategies within SP10. Related research studies – on ground motion estimation, on the assessment of human casualties, and on the evaluation of uncertainty have been carried out by other research teams across Europe which includes INGV, UCAM and USUR respectively. In all three of the cities, a common general approach to loss modelling has been adopted which includes representing the earthquake hazard as a set of alternative ground motion scenarios (typically those with an expected recurrence periods of 50 and 500 years), and applying the ground motion over a target area of known population and building stock. Losses have then been estimated for this target area in terms of levels of building damage and human casualties expected both in the existing state of the target area, and after certain selected potential mitigation actions have been carried out. This has been done in each case using building stock classifications and vulnerability data specific to the particular city concerned. In each case the scope of the proposed mitigation action has been described, and its expected benefit in terms of reduced losses and human casualties has been determined with some preliminary assessment of uncertainty.
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
This self-contained document provides a presentation and illustration of two methods (one based on non-linear static analysis, the other on non-linear time-history analysis) for probabilistic seismic risk assessment of structures. The presented methods belong to a class which has been under development (mainly in the US) since more than a decade, and it is now firmly established and gaining wide international acceptance. The principal appeal of these methods is that they require only a limited background in probability and statistics. While they are presently directly usable for the assessment of existing structures, their extension for direct design purposes is currently under way. In order to facilitate the use of these methods the type and amount of information required for their application is also illustrated in this document. In particular, one chapter introduces the probabilistic representation, and evaluation, of the seismic hazard (PSHA) and the issue of selection and scaling of recorded ground motions for the purpose of dynamic analysis. A further chapter gives an overview of the most recent research aimed at developing models for the capacity (strength or deformability) of structural members and connections/joints in RC and steel structures. A detailed presentation of several case-studies illustrating the two approaches completes the document.
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation: