CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association Software Software Installation Problems & Bugs Archive Problem ETABS - seismic weight

ETABS - seismic weight
 juice

Semi Senior Member

Retired Moderator
Afghanistan
User ID: 108
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 90
Threads: 8
Likes: 362 in 68 posts
Given Likes: 176
Points:4,193 EP
#1
02-04-2009, 11:28 PM
Here's another tip to newbie ETABS user; always make a rough estimate of your seismic weight and compare this to what ETABS is giving you. :idea:



[-] The following 5 users Like juice's post:5 users Like juice's post
  • Yasir, Yasir, ruaumoko, ruaumoko, blackjack
 aslam

Not-Activated

Abu Dhabi
User ID: 64
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 786
Threads: 330
Likes: 7,707 in 755 posts
Given Likes: 2168
Points:42,050 EP
#2
02-05-2009, 01:20 PM
Mass source :

Full dead load

some percentage of live load as per code.



[-] The following 1 user Likes aslam's post:1 user Likes aslam's post
  • levanduy
 juice

Semi Senior Member

Retired Moderator
Afghanistan
User ID: 108
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 90
Threads: 8
Likes: 362 in 68 posts
Given Likes: 176
Points:4,193 EP
#3
02-05-2009, 11:36 PM
(02-05-2009, 01:20 PM)aslam Wrote: Mass source :

Full dead load

some percentage of live load as per code.

hi aslam, try to make an estimate of your seismic weight outside of ETABS' results for you to get a good feel on what ETABS had outputted.




  •
 juice

Semi Senior Member

Retired Moderator
Afghanistan
User ID: 108
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 90
Threads: 8
Likes: 362 in 68 posts
Given Likes: 176
Points:4,193 EP
#4
02-14-2009, 10:01 PM
ETABS newbies: check your definition of seismic mass source; it may be doubling your self-weight. :D




  •
 robertsas

Professional Member

Retired Moderator
Indonesia
User ID: 655
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 433
Threads: 159
Likes: 5,665 in 416 posts
Given Likes: 3149
Points:27,503 EP
#5
02-27-2009, 03:12 PM (This post was last modified: 02-27-2009, 03:24 PM by robertsas.)
My Opinion :

Separated your DEAD LOAD become Self Weight Dead Load and Super Imposed Dead Load.

The Dead Load for mass source is Super Imposed Dead Load (exclude Self Weight Dead Load).

I think double value of self weight because you do not separate the DEAD LOAD for calculate the mass source.

Please correct me if I wrong..

Regards,
robertsasmita



[-] The following 1 user Likes robertsas's post:1 user Likes robertsas's post
  • levanduy
 Elijah

Not-Activated

White-private
User ID: 126
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 33
Threads: 17
Likes: 299 in 34 posts
Given Likes: 18
Points:3,233 EP
#6
02-27-2009, 05:29 PM
Look at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRvoU-35SL8



[-] The following 1 user Likes Elijah's post:1 user Likes Elijah's post
  • levanduy
 juice

Semi Senior Member

Retired Moderator
Afghanistan
User ID: 108
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 90
Threads: 8
Likes: 362 in 68 posts
Given Likes: 176
Points:4,193 EP
#7
02-28-2009, 12:34 AM
if you intend to use the third option for mass source definition, you have to separate self weight from your superimposed dead load. and define your mass source as superimposed dead load, part of live load. any mass defined in the model will also be included internally by ETABS aside from the building self weight.

regards,
juice



[-] The following 3 users Like juice's post:3 users Like juice's post
  • Yasir, Yasir, levanduy
 robertsas

Professional Member

Retired Moderator
Indonesia
User ID: 655
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 433
Threads: 159
Likes: 5,665 in 416 posts
Given Likes: 3149
Points:27,503 EP
#8
02-28-2009, 12:44 AM (This post was last modified: 02-28-2009, 12:50 AM by robertsas.)
yes..
any other opinion from other member ?

regards,
robertsasmita




  •
 piscesa

Not-Activated

White-private
User ID: 375
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 6
Threads: 0
Likes: 21 in 4 posts
Given Likes: 13
Points:472 EP
#9
05-12-2009, 03:45 PM (This post was last modified: 05-12-2009, 03:47 PM by piscesa.)
Yups... that's right any additional dead load besides the selfweight needs to be separated to prevent double calculating of selfweight in mass source. Additional dead load which known as superimposed load should be added when third option of mass source is used with load factor 1 and life load should be added with load factor according to the spesific code (Usually 0.3).

CMIIW,
regards




  •
 iceman84

Not-Activated

White-private
User ID: 1829
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 245
Threads: 48
Likes: 419 in 154 posts
Given Likes: 402
Points:8,906 EP
#10
05-18-2009, 07:34 AM
I usually use the second option (from loads). All the coeficients are those given in the seismic codes (1 for dead loads and permanent loads and 0.4/0.3 for live loads). The third option can also be used (in this case only the dead load is 0, the rest of the loads have the same coeficients).




  •
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Pages (2): 1 2 Next »



  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode