CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association Portal

Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 133,458
» Latest member: Mitchar1
» Forum threads: 31,885
» Forum posts: 105,654

Full Statistics

Latest Threads
Service Interruption Noti...
Forum: CivilEA News
Last Post: agdwarouw
28 minutes ago
» Replies: 56
» Views: 3,093
CSI.SAP2000.v27.0
Forum: SAP2000
Last Post: mowafi3m
03-07-2026, 09:12 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 354
AUTOCAD 2027
Forum: Autodesk Products
Last Post: rami1976
02-26-2026, 12:04 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 760
Designing Tall Buildings:...
Forum: Analysis & Design
Last Post: lisine
02-21-2026, 08:26 AM
» Replies: 8
» Views: 11,199
FIB Bulletins
Forum: Concrete
Last Post: milova
02-12-2026, 04:18 AM
» Replies: 24
» Views: 15,178
Building Construction Par...
Forum: Other Materials (Wood, Brick, etc.)
Last Post: milova
02-12-2026, 02:57 AM
» Replies: 10
» Views: 6,247
Eurocodes (old and drafts...
Forum: Eurocode (EC)
Last Post: milova
02-03-2026, 01:40 AM
» Replies: 14
» Views: 19,385
Unable to download
Forum: Suggestion & Complains
Last Post: Administrator
01-25-2026, 10:14 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 912
ETABSv2311Build4293
Forum: ETABS
Last Post: babakfeyzi
01-07-2026, 07:31 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 724
AISC - Steel Construction...
Forum: AISC
Last Post: pezhmankhan
01-02-2026, 09:31 PM
» Replies: 24
» Views: 24,554

 
  Nonlinear response of fixed jacket offshore platform under structural and wave loads
Posted by: TAFATNEB - 11-25-2013, 04:14 PM - Forum: Journals, Papers and Presentations - No Replies

Nonlinear response of fixed jacket offshore platform under structural and wave loads

Author: Shehata E. Abdel Raheem | Size: 6.3 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | Publisher: Coupled Systems Mechanics, Vol. 2, No. 1 (2013) 111-126 | Year: 2013 | pages: 16

[Image: 26065622544055025111.png]


[Image: info.png]

The structural design requirements of an offshore platform subjected to wave induced forces and moments in the jacket can play a major role in the design of the offshore structures. For an economic and reliable design; good estimation of wave loadings are essential. A nonlinear response analysis of a fixed
offshore platform under structural and wave loading is presented, the structure is discretized using the finite
element method, wave plus current kinematics (veloc
ity and acceleration fields) are generated using 5th order Stokes wave theory, the wave force acting on the member is calculated using Morison’s equation. Hydrodynamic loading on horizontal and vertical tubular members and the dynamic response of fixedoffshore structure together with th e distribution of displacement, axial force and bending moment along the leg are investigated for regular and extreme cond
itions, where the structure should keep production
capability in conditions of the 1-yr return period wave and must be able to survive the 100-yr return period
storm conditions. The result of the study shows that the nonlinear response investigation is quite crucial for
safe design and operation of offshore platform.

[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator v2.2.0

Print this item

  OPTIMUM DESIGN OF PIN-JOINTED 3-D DOME STRUCTURES USING GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUE
Posted by: TAFATNEB - 11-25-2013, 12:58 PM - Forum: Civil Engineering MSc and PhD thesis - Replies (1)

OPTIMUM DESIGN OF PIN-JOINTED 3-D DOME STRUCTURES USING GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES

Author: YAVUZ SARAÇ | Size: 9.31 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | Year: November 2005, | pages: 204

[Image: 86181052248862123933.png]


[Image: info.png]

Difficult gradient calculations, converging to a local optimum without exploring the design space adequately, too much dependency on the starting solution, lacking capabilities to treat discrete and mixed design variables are the main drawbacks of conventional optimization techniques. So evolutionary optimization methods received significant interest amongst researchers in the optimization area. Genetic algorithms (GAs) and simulated annealing (SA) are the main representatives of evolutionary optimization methods. These techniques emerged as powerful and modern strategies to efficiently deal with the difficulties encountered in conventional techniques, and therefore rightly attracted a substantial interest and


[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator v2.2.0

Print this item

  Precast Balanced Cantilever Bridge Design Using AASHTO LRFD Design Specifications
Posted by: subin91 - 11-25-2013, 10:43 AM - Forum: Bridge (Project and Technology) - No Replies

Precast Balanced Cantilever Bridge Design Using AASHTO LRFD Design Specifications

Author: American Segmental Bridge Institute | Size: 3 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | Year: 2004 | pages: 139

[Image: 62137813371561468798.jpg]


[Image: info.png]

Precast Balanced Cantilever Bridge Design Using AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications

[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator v2.2.0

Print this item

  Construction Technology For Tall Buildings
Posted by: pezhmankhan - 11-25-2013, 05:40 AM - Forum: Archive - Replies (1)

  • Article/eBook Full Name: Construction Technology For Tall Buildings
  • Author(s): Yit Lin Chew, Michael
  • Edition: 3 rd
  • Publish Date: 2009
  • ISBN: 978-981-281-861-4
  • Published By: worldscientific
  • Related Links:

    Code:
    ***************************************
    Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

    http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
    ***************************************

Print this item

  BS EN 480-11:2005
Posted by: ak_civil85 - 11-24-2013, 03:34 PM - Forum: Archive - Replies (2)

Standard Number BS EN 480-11:2005
Title Admixtures for concrete, mortar and grout. Test methodsDetermination of air void characteristics in hardened concrete
Status Current
Publication Date 14 December 2005

Print this item

  Seismic strengthening of RC structures with exterior shear walls
Posted by: TAFATNEB - 11-24-2013, 12:03 AM - Forum: Journals, Papers and Presentations - No Replies

Seismic strengthening of RC structures with exterior shear walls

Author: HASAN KAPLAN1, SALIH YILMAZ , ∗ , NIHAT CETINKAYA and ERGIN ATIMTAY | Size: 0.82 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | Publisher: S¯ adhan¯ a Vol. 36, Part 1, February 2011, pp. 17–34. © Indian Academy of Sciences | Year: 2009 | pages: 18

[Image: 36231909557628199906.png]


[Image: info.png]


Vulnerable buildings and their rehabilitation are important problems for earthquake regions. In recent decades the goal of building rehabilitation and strengthening has gained research attention and numerous techniques have been developed to achieve this. However, most of these strengthening techniques disturb the occupants, who must vacate the building during renovation. In this study, a new strengthening alternative for RC structures, namely exterior shear walls, has been experimentally investigated under reversed cyclic loading. Using the proposed technique, it is possible to strengthen structures without disturbing their users or vacating the building during renovation. In this technique, shear walls are installed in parallel to the building’s exterior sides. It has been observed that the usage of exterior shear walls considerably improve the capacity and sway stiffness of RC structures. The experimental results have also been compared and found to be in agreement with the numerical solutions. Post attached exterior shear walls behaved as a monolithic member of the structure.
Design considerations for the exterior shear wall-strengthened buildings have also been discussed in the paper.


[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator v2.2.0

Print this item

  SEISMIC RETROFIT OF STEEL STRUCTURES
Posted by: TAFATNEB - 11-23-2013, 11:51 PM - Forum: Journals, Papers and Presentations - No Replies

This paper provides a brief review of recent work on the development of solutions for the seismic design and retrofit of steel structures by va rious members of the U.S. research community, including solutions being developed at the Univers ity at Buffalo for the seismic retrofit of bridges and buildings.

Author: Michel Bruneau | Size: 3.8 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | Publisher: Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, and Professor, Department of Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering, 105 Red Jacket Quadrangle, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14261, USA. | pages: 16

[Image: 90170904648446124263.png]


[Image: info.png]

This paper provides a brief review of recent work on the development of solutions for the seismic
design and retrofit of steel structures by various members of the U.S. research community,
including solutions being developed at the University at Buffalo for the seismic retrofit of bridges
and buildings.


[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator v2.2.0

Print this item

  HOW HAVE CHANGES IN BUILDING CODE PROVISIONS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAME STRUCTURES
Posted by: TAFATNEB - 11-23-2013, 11:45 PM - Forum: Journals, Papers and Presentations - No Replies

HOW HAVE CHANGES IN BUILDING CODE PROVISIONS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAME STRUCTURES IMPROVED SEISMIC SAFETY?

Author: . B. Liel , C. B. Haselton , and G. G. Deierlein | Size: 0.3 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | Publisher: Dept. of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford | pages: 10

[Image: 61478290017162805256.png]


[Image: info.png]

This study provides an analytical comparison of seismic performance of a typical California office building designed according to the 1967 Uniform Building Code and the 2003 International Building Code. The seismic performance predictions are based on a performance assessment method developed by the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center, which employs incremental nonlinear dynamic time-history analyses. Comparisons are made for a four-story reinforced concrete (RC) moment frame building designed to be representative of a) pre-1970 non-ductile reinforced concrete construction and b) modern (2003) ductile reinforced concrete construction. The plan and elevation of the building are identical for both structures; differences are evident in the magnitude of design loading, the relative strength of structural elements, and detailing of beams, columns, and beam column joints. For each building, a nonlinear dynamic analysis model captures the behavior of the important failure modes up to the onset of collapse, accounting for uncertainties in structural behavior, modeling, and ground motions. The performance quantity of interest in this study is the collapse risk, particularly mean annual frequency of collapse. By comparing the computed
collapse risk for the two structures, performance improvements in RC frame buildings over the three decades since the San Fernando earthquake can be
quantified.


[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator v2.2.0

Print this item

  Pushover and Seismic Response of Foundations on Stiff Clay: Analysis with P-Delta Eff
Posted by: TAFATNEB - 11-23-2013, 11:32 PM - Forum: Journals, Papers and Presentations - No Replies

Pushover and Seismic Response of Foundations on Stiff Clay: Analysis with P-Delta Effects

Author: Andriani I. Panagiotidou, George Gazetas, and Nikos Gerolymos | Size: 1.4 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | Publisher: Earthquake Spectra, Volume 28, No. 4, pages 1589–1618, November 2012; © 2012, Earthquake Engineering Research Institu | Year: 2012 | pages: 30

[Image: 68508770880169823257.png]


[Image: info.png]

Finite-element analyses are performed for the response to lateral monotonic, slow-cyclic, and seismic loading of rigid footings carrying tall slender structures and supported on stiff clay. The response involves mainly footing rotation under the action of overturning moments from the horizontal external force on—or the developing inertia at—the mass of the structure, as well as from the aggravating contribution of its weight (P-delta effect). Emphasis is given to the conditions for collapse of the soil-foundation-structure system. Two interconnected mechanisms of nonlinearity are considered: detachment from the soil with subsequent uplifting of the foundation (geometric nonlinearity) and formation of bearingcapacity failure surfaces (material inelasticity). The relation between monotonic behavior (static “pushover”), slow-cyclic behavior, and seismic response is explored parametrically. We show that with “light” structures uplifting is the dominant mechanism that may lead to collapse by dynamic instability (overturning), whereas “very heavy” structures mobilize soil failure mechanisms, leading to accumulation of settlement, residual rotation, and ultimately collapse.

[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator v2.2.0

Print this item

  FURTHER PROBING OF THE SUITABILITY OF PUSH- OVER ANALYSIS FOR THE SEISMIC ASSESSMENT
Posted by: TAFATNEB - 11-23-2013, 11:25 PM - Forum: Journals, Papers and Presentations - No Replies

FURTHER PROBING OF THE SUITABILITY OF PUSH- OVER ANALYSIS FOR THE SEISMIC ASSESSMENT OF BRIDGE STRUCTURES

Author: ALESSIO LUPOI University of Rome “Sapienza”, Dpt. of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, PAOLO FRANCHIN University of Rome “Sapienza”, Dpt. of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, .PAOLO E. PINTO University of Rome “Sapienza”, Dpt. of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, | Size: 0.67 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | pages: 16

[Image: 66510323114823994957.png]


[Image: info.png]

The applicability of non-linear static analyses for the assessment of less-thanregular bridges has been subject of recent research by a number of authors ([11,13,14]), with mixed results. The study presented in the paper intends to provide a further example of application of the approach to a bridge whose characteristics are such as to test it in a rather extreme case. This is an existing important highway viaduct built in the sixties, of total length equal to 420m, with 11 spans of 33m each and a continuous RC deck pinned over the piers. These latter, whose height varies irregularly between 14m and 41m, consist of slender single-bay frames with intermediate transverse beams. Among the numerous proposals available, the multi-modal nonadaptive approach as proposed by Chopra et al. [4] has been chosen as the preferred compromise between accuracy and complexity. The selected structure is characterised by at least two modes providing comparable contributions to the transversal response. In view of the final comparison of the results with those from non-linear dynamic analyses, the critical question of the choice of the reference response dof to be monitored has been investigated as well as the approximation of the method as a function of the intensity of the seismic action (inducing a variable degree of inelasticity in the structure).


[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator v2.2.0

Print this item

Pages (2106): « Previous 1 … 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 … 2106 Next »

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB