Growing needs for modern transportation and utility networks have increased the demand for a more extensive and elaborate use of underground space. As a result, more underground projects have to be completed in a variety of ground conditions, including weak water bearing soils and soft rocks. Significant technological advances have rendered these projects possible, but have also given rise to new challenges as many of these projects have to be completed in difficult conditions, with very strict environmental constraints, particularly in urban areas where the potential impact of tunneling on existing structures is a major concern. This report addresses the main aspects of tunneling and underground works performed in soils and soft rocks. A summary is presented of the main features related to construction techniques, ground investigations, design methods, and instrumentation and monitoring practices, as well as of some of the more recent advances in these fields.
Significant progress has been made in the area of soft ground tunneling over the past thirty years, partly because of advances in computer technologies. The scope of increasing difficult project conditions to be addressed requires that the best use be made of these technologies, as well as of lessons gained from past experience and current observational records.
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
UNDERGROUND WORKS IN HARD ROCK TUNNELLING AND MINING
ABSTRACT
The rock mass around an underground opening is subjected to a unique stress path that results in low radial confinement and both tangential loading and unloading conditions near the wall. As a result, the rock mass strength near underground excavations is controlled by failure mechanisms dominating at low confinement.
Hence, when constructing underground works in hard rock, two general scenarios are encountered:
(1) structurally controlled gravity-driven failures; and (2) stress-induced failure with spalling and slabbing. The former process is predominant when both the radial and the tangential stresses are low, where as the latter is prevalent when high tangential stresses drive rock mass failure. Whereas structurally controlled failures are most frequently observed at shallow depths and slabbing failure is commonly found at great depth, mining and tunnelling experience shows that these failure processes may be encountered at essentially
any depth. In this keynote the authors provide an overall framework for assessing the stability of underground openings in hard rocks, regardless whether the excavations are required for mining, nuclear waste or civil engineering application.
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
This lecture deals with tunnelling under squeezing rock conditions. Following an outline of the main factors influencing squeezing, the definition of this type of behaviour, as proposed by ISRM (International Society for Rock Mechanics) in 1995, is given. An overview of the methods used for identification and quantification of squeezing is presented, along with the empirical and semi-empirical approaches presently available in order to anticipate the potential of squeezing tunnel problems. A brief historical retrospective is reported on the excavation and support methods used in Italy in order to cope with squeezing conditions at the end of 1800, when the first railway tunnels were excavated.
Based on the experiences made and lessons learned in recent years through important tunnelling works in Europe, an attempt is made to trace the state of the art in modern construction methods, when dealing with squeezing conditions by either conventional or mechanised excavation. The closed-form solutions available for the analysis of the rock mass response during tunnel excavation are described in terms of the ground characteristic line and with reference to some elasto-plastic or elasto-visco-plastic stress-strain models for the rock mass. Also described are the equations for the support characteristic lines.
Then, the use of numerical methods for the simulation of different models of behaviour and for design analysis of complex excavation and support systems is considered, also including three-dimensional conditions near the advancing tunnel face.
Finally, a brief discussion on monitoring methods is given, in conjunction with a short description of a case study.
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
The complex variable method for solving two dimensional linearly elastic problems is used to obtain several fundamental analytical solutions of tunneling problems.
The method is used to derive the general mathematical representation of problems involving resultant forces on holes in a half-plane. Such problems are encountered in geomechanics during the excavation of tunnels. When tunnels are excavated the removal of the weighted material inside the tunnel causes the ground under the tunnel to rebound. This in turn causes a resultant force, referred to here as the buoyancy force, to act on the tunnel until the stresses return to a state of equilibrium. The mathematical representation derived in this thesis shows that the displacements will usually be unbounded at infinity in solutions of two-dimensional problems involving resultant forces acting on holes in a half-plane.
]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
Prediction of surface settlements due to tunneling in soft ground
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
HA 68/94 Design Methods for the REinforcement of Highway Slopes by Reinforced Soil and Soil Nailing Techniques
Abstract
Gives guidance on the design requirements for the strengthening of highway earthworks using reinforced soil and soil nailing techniques. It applies to the construction of new earthworks, the widening of existing embankments, the steepening of existing cuttings, and the repair of failed slopes.
History
DMRB 4.1.4. Design manual for roads and bridges (DMRB). Old series - DMRB Departmental Advice Notes (Highways). Not formally implemented by the NRA for use in Ireland, but should be considered as background reading.
ISBN
9780115512506
Year
1994
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
Can somebody share a example or a tutorial for a lightweight fabric structure made with Oasys GSA 8.x or 7.x . I am new to the program and I'm having problems with finding convergent solutions in the formfinding analysis case .
Bracing Cold-Formed Steel Structures: A Design Guide
Description
Prepared by the Committee on Cold-Formed Steel and the Committee on Metal of the Structural Engineering Institute of ASCE.
This report documents the current practices related to bracing cold-formed steel structure elements and systems. Heavy on applications and examples, this book contains design examples illustrating bracing design for various types of cold-formed steel structures, as well as an extensive list of primary reference sources.
Topics include:
•introduction to bracing design;
•cold-formed framing;
•cold-formed steel in metal building systems; and
•miscellaneous cold-formed steel elements and systems.
This report is presented as a design guide and will assist the practicing engineer in designing cold-formed steel structures with greater levels of reliability, safety, and economy.
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
Does somebody can download the missing pages?
Missing pages you can download with Google Books Downloader:
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
Here I want to show the speed of NET 3.5 vs Intel Fortran.
I was amazing when I saw that NET application runs to fast versus Intel Fortran application.
I was used XP SP3, Visual Studio 2008 with NET 3.5 and Intel Fortran 11.1.067.
In both programs the same mathematical procedure is implemented. Solving of equations by Gauss elimination process.
The results for solving 1000 equations are:
computer: CPU2.6GHz, RAM 1.7GB, XP Sp3 NET 3.5 = 4.7sec
Intel Fortran = 16.8sec
Lahey Fortran = 7.2sec
Winner is NET application.
Maybe I made some mistake in Intel Fortran Compiler. Maybe I didn't include any optimization.
Here are source codes and executable files.
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation: