CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association eBooks General Books Civil Engineering MSc and PhD thesis Seismic Risk Assessment of Unreinforced Brick Masonry Buildings System of Northern Pa

Seismic Risk Assessment of Unreinforced Brick Masonry Buildings System of Northern Pa
 TAFATNEB

Professional Member

Registered
Algeria
User ID: 29701
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,197
Threads: 830
Likes: 9,403 in 1,160 posts
Given Likes: 2851
Points:118,565 EP
#1
11-02-2013, 12:53 PM
Seismic Risk Assessment of Unreinforced Brick Masonry Buildings System of Northern Pakistan

Author: MOHAMMAD JAVED | Size: 6.8 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | Publisher: Department of Civil Engineering, N-W.F.P. University of Engineering and Technology | Year: 2009 | pages: 230

[Image: 62232997240174817173.png]


[Image: info.png]


This research work was aimed at assessing the seismic risk of unreinforced brick masonry buildings’
system of Northern Pakistan, constructed in stone dust mortar. To accomplish this, four series of
unreinforced brick masonry piers constructed in stone dust mortar were tested in the in-plane direction
using quasi-static method of testing. Each pier series comprised of three piers with identical properties
and thus a total of twelve piers were tested. Aspect ratio and pre-compression were kept as the main
variables. Various properties such as displacement ductility factors, ultimate drift ratios, coefficient of
equivalent viscous damping, stiffness degradation and modulus of rigidity were determined using the
experimental data from quasi-static cyclic tests on the piers. The effect of pre-compression on the
coefficient of equivalent viscous damping and stiffness degradation were studied. Similarly, the effect
of drift ratio on the coefficient of equivalent viscous damping was also studied. Various performance evels for unreinforced brick masonry piers, in relation to drift ratios, were also recommended. Based on the results of experimental work, a methodology was proposed for lateral strength assessment of unreinforced brick masonry buildings. The developed methodology produced satisfactory results when compared with the results of full-scale unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings tested at University of Pavia, Italy [MKC 95] and Georgia Institute of Technology, USA [ Yi 04]. Although the proposed methodology was used for brick masonry buildings, it can be applied to other types of masonry (such as stone and concrete block masonry constructed in cement: sand mortar, lime mortar, etc.) if the properties required to quantify the seismic performance (e.g., displacement ductility factors and ultimate drift ratios of masonry piers, etc.) are experimentally known. Various performance levels for unreinforced brick masonry buildings were also recommended in relation to drift ratios. Finally, seismic capacities of thirty-one buildings were evaluated. The buildings’ stock consisted of seventeen single-story and fourteen double-story buildings. The buildings were selected keeping in view their common typological use in urban areas of Northern Pakistan. Fragility curves, showing the probabilities of reaching or exceeding various performance levels at various levels of ground shaking, were drawn for various performance limit states. It was found by studying the fragility curves that the probability of occurrence for various performance levels of single- and double- story buildings do not differ significantly. It was also concluded that unreinforced brick masonry, if
properly constructed, can be safely used in localities placed in seismic zone 2b [BCP 07] and below.


[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator v2.2.0



[-] The following 3 users Like TAFATNEB's post:3 users Like TAFATNEB's post
  • blaze, malc, vardan
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Seismic Performance Assessment and Probabilistic Repair Cost Analysis of Precast Conc TAFATNEB 0 739 07-03-2015, 10:30 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  SEISMIC PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS WITH PRECAST CONCRETE TAFATNEB 0 945 03-27-2015, 03:16 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Assessment of Progressive Collapse Requirements for Precast Concrete Buildings TAFATNEB 0 897 12-13-2014, 05:08 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Performance-Based Seismic Demand Assessment of Concentrically Braced Steel Frame Buil TAFATNEB 0 741 05-09-2014, 05:09 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Seismic Performance, Modeling, and Failure Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Shear Wa TAFATNEB 0 786 05-09-2014, 04:00 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  COLLAPSE ASSESSMENT OF CONCRETE BUILDINGS: AN APPLICATION TO NON-DUCTILE REINFORCED C TAFATNEB 0 809 12-28-2013, 08:59 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Seismic risk computation for the base - isolated reactor building of the IRIS NPP TAFATNEB 0 667 12-20-2013, 10:09 AM
Last Post: TAFATNEB

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode