CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association eBooks General Books Civil Engineering MSc and PhD thesis Analysis of a Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall|2007

Analysis of a Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall|2007
 parhyang

Not-Activated

White-private
User ID: 25165
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 255
Threads: 30
Likes: 1,261 in 219 posts
Given Likes: 447
Points:14,074 EP
#1
11-12-2010, 09:56 AM (This post was last modified: 11-16-2010, 08:31 AM by parhyang.)
Analysis of a Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall
M.Sc Thesis
Björk Hauksdóttir, 2007

[Image: 73520535232818296144.png]

Abstract
In June 2000 two major earthquakes with moment magnitude 6.6 occurred, after 88 years of rest, in the central part of the South Iceland Seismic Zone (SIZS). Earthquakes in this region have several times since the settlement of Iceland caused collapse of the majority of houses and number of casualties. It has been estimated that no more than one fourth of the strain energy in the SIZS was released in the two June 2000 earthquakes resulting in that large earthquakes may occur in the zone during the next few decades.
The main objective of the research work presented in this thesis is to study the nonlinear behavior of a reinforced concrete shear wall with different reinforcement arrangements in an idealized three story building located in the SISZ subjected to a step-wise increasing lateral earthquake load.
Four different reinforcement arrangements of the shear wall are considered. Firstly, a reinforcement in which the design is based on the Stringer method. Secondly, a reinforcement in which the design is based on linear elastic finite element method analysis using general purpose FE-program (SAP2000). Thirdly, a reinforcement again based on linear elastic FEM but here using a building specialized FE-program (ETABS), which has a special post-processor to present section forces. Fourthly, a reinforcement based on minimum reinforcement requirements from Eurocode 2.
The nonlinear behavior of the four different reinforced shear walls is then tested by non-linear pushover analysis using the general purpose FE-program ANSYS. An attempt is made to evaluate crack width calculations as a function of load to reflect the damage. The study show that different reinforcement layouts affect the response of the wall and the difference in crack width is mainly due to the boundary reinforcement. The crack widths calculated by using the information from ANSYS seem to be promising and useful when designing and analysing structures in seismic zones.

Donwload links,
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************

fig1.
[Image: 39678822866572004579.png]

fig2.
[Image: 03222642383053808968.png]

fig3.
[Image: 77740579318801387746.png]

fig4.
[Image: 27130880256564443694.png]

Note: zipped files i store is 7zip compatibility and may not work properly in your zip/rar.
another options are download directly,
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************



[-] The following 19 users Like parhyang's post:19 users Like parhyang's post
  • Haseeb Jamal, chigozie, Dell_Brett, oanm2000, jcoronellr, Adam Smith, bosnawi, TAFATNEB, malc, techno, atram, Jackass, subin91, sodapas, SCREAM7890, engrezi, zego2000, Aransam, chairatpk
Away  joker™

Professional Member

Moderators
United Nations
User ID: 10925
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 944
Threads: 92
Likes: 7,242 in 937 posts
Given Likes: 2422
Points:37,111 EP
#2
01-29-2012, 08:26 AM
[Image: mirror.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************
No limits to creativity
My body may be broken , but my spirit still fights for freedom



[-] The following 8 users Like joker™'s post:8 users Like joker™'s post
  • blaze, techno, isurya, tommy999, sructme, simanta, SCREAM7890, TAFATNEB
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Non-linear analysis of a collapsed reinforced concrete chimney mybest 1 1,314 11-06-2020, 08:17 AM
Last Post: lisine
  The Seismic Analysis of Statically Designed Tall Reinforced Concrete Buildings Using bridgeengineer 0 851 04-20-2016, 09:31 AM
Last Post: bridgeengineer
  SEISMIC PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGS WITH PRECAST CONCRETE TAFATNEB 0 938 03-27-2015, 03:16 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Inelastic seismic response of precast concrete large panel coupled shear wall sys TAFATNEB 0 882 03-27-2015, 11:44 AM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Design and Analysis of Complex D-Regions in Reinforced Concrete Structures nima_b12 1 1,070 07-21-2014, 01:23 PM
Last Post: apocalipse
  SHEAR STREN GTH OF CIRCULAR REINFORCED CONCRETE COLUMNS TAFATNEB 0 717 06-01-2014, 03:41 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  PUNCHING SHEAR STRENGTH AND DE FORMATION CAPACITY OF FIBER REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB-C TAFATNEB 0 747 06-01-2014, 03:30 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode