CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association Portal

Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 131,871
» Latest member: ahmaed94
» Forum threads: 31,852
» Forum posts: 105,498

Full Statistics

Latest Threads
ACI 318: Building Code R...
Forum: ACI
Last Post: poolmand
Yesterday, 06:53 AM
» Replies: 80
» Views: 21,245
Bentley Microstran V9
Forum: Bentley Products
Last Post: j4fz
06-29-2025, 05:51 AM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 8,402
Autodesk Advance steel 20...
Forum: Autodesk Products
Last Post: rami1976
06-04-2025, 09:45 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 913
Autocad 2026
Forum: Autodesk Products
Last Post: pezhmankhan
05-27-2025, 10:32 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 1,009
Autodesk Robot 2026
Forum: Autodesk Products
Last Post: rami1976
05-27-2025, 09:10 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 605
Lavteam site is down?
Forum: Free Discussion
Last Post: jorgeramos
05-17-2025, 01:47 PM
» Replies: 8
» Views: 2,543
Earthquake-Resistant Desi...
Forum: Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Last Post: lisine
05-13-2025, 01:35 PM
» Replies: 7
» Views: 3,220
Comprehensive Design of S...
Forum: Books and Codes Request
Last Post: civilfafa
04-27-2025, 09:47 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 1,883
AASHTO FRPS-2 Guide Speci...
Forum: Books and Codes Request
Last Post: civilfafa
04-27-2025, 09:46 AM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 616
ACI/PCI 319: Structural P...
Forum: ACI
Last Post: poolmand
04-19-2025, 12:57 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 805

 
  Engineering Policy Guidelines For Design Of Driven Piles
Posted by: mahyarov - 10-29-2012, 07:23 AM - Forum: Foundation & Geotechnics in general - No Replies

Evaluation of Continuity Detail for Precast Prestressed Girders

Author: Loehr, J Erik | Size: 598 KB | Format: PDF | Quality: Original preprint | Publisher: Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla | Year: 2011 | pages: 26

[Image: 83457734444075791278.png]


[Image: info.png]

These guidelines were developed as part of a comprehensive research program undertaken by the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) to reduce costs associated with design and construction of bridge foundations while maintaining appropriate levels of safety for the traveling public. The guidelines were established from a combination of existing MoDOT Engineering Policy Guide (EPG) documents, from the 4th Edition of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications with 2009 Interim Revisions, and from results of the research program. Some provisions of the guidelines represent substantial changes to current practice to reflect advancements made possible from results of the research program. Other provisions were left essentially unchanged, or were revised to reflect incremental changes in practice, because research was not performed to address those provisions. Some provisions reflect rational starting points based on judgment and past experience from which further improvements can be based. All of the provisions should be considered as “living documents” subject to further revision and refinement as additional knowledge and experience is gained with the respective provisions. A number of specific opportunities for improvement are provided in the commentary that accompanies the guidelines.

[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator ver 2.1.6

Print this item

  Engineering Policy Guidelines For Design Of Drilled Shafts
Posted by: mahyarov - 10-29-2012, 07:22 AM - Forum: Foundation & Geotechnics in general - No Replies

Evaluation of Continuity Detail for Precast Prestressed Girders

Author: Loehr, J Erik | Size: 7.26 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Original preprint | Publisher: Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla | Year: 2011 | pages: 77

[Image: 45540023509996093332.png]


[Image: info.png]

These guidelines were developed as part of a comprehensive research program undertaken by the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) to reduce costs associated with design and construction of bridge foundations while maintaining appropriate levels of safety for the traveling public. The guidelines were established from a combination of existing MoDOT Engineering Policy Guide (EPG) documents, from the 4th Edition of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications with 2009 Interim Revisions, and from results of the research program. Some provisions of the guidelines represent substantial changes to current practice to reflect advancements made possible from results of the research program. Other provisions were left essentially unchanged, or were revised to reflect incremental changes in practice, because research was not performed to address those provisions. Some provisions reflect rational starting points based on judgment and past experience from which further improvements can be based. All of the provisions should be considered as “living documents” subject to further revision and refinement as additional knowledge and experience is gained with the respective provisions. A number of specific opportunities for improvement are provided in the commentary that accompanies the guidelines.

[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator ver 2.1.6

Print this item

  Engineering Policy Guidelines For Design Of Spread Footings
Posted by: mahyarov - 10-29-2012, 07:20 AM - Forum: Foundation & Geotechnics in general - Replies (1)

Engineering Policy Guidelines For Design Of Spread Footings

Author: Loehr, J Erik | Size: 7.08 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Original preprint | Publisher: Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla | Year: 2011 | pages: 44

[Image: 67278855403508160304.jpg]

[Image: info.png]
These guidelines were developed as part of a comprehensive research program undertaken by the Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT) to reduce costs associated with design and construction of bridge foundations while maintaining appropriate levels of safety for the traveling public. The guidelines were established from a combination of existing MoDOT Engineering Policy Guide (EPG) documents, from the 4th Edition of the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications with 2009 Interim Revisions, and from results of the research program. Some provisions of the guidelines represent substantial changes to current practice to reflect advancements made possible from results of the research program. Other provisions were left essentially unchanged, or were revised to reflect incremental changes in practice, because research was not performed to address those provisions. Some provisions reflect rational starting points based on judgment and past experience from which further improvements can be based. All of the provisions should be considered as “living documents” subject to further revision and refinement as additional knowledge and experience is gained with the respective provisions. A number of specific opportunities for improvement are provided in the commentary that accompanies the guidelines.

[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator ver 2.1.6

Print this item

  Evaluation of Continuity Detail for Precast Prestressed Girders
Posted by: mahyarov - 10-29-2012, 07:18 AM - Forum: Concrete - No Replies

Evaluation of Continuity Detail for Precast Prestressed Girders

Author: Okeil, Ayman M Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge Cai, Steve Chebole, Veeravenkata Hossain, Tanvir | Size: 7.10 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Original preprint | Publisher: Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge | Year: 2011 | pages: 206

[Image: 49481732653903731239.png]


[Image: info.png]

The construction of highway bridges using precast prestressed concrete (PSC) girders is considered one of the most economical construction alternatives because of the advantages they offer (e.g. reducing formwork and rapid construction). Constructing multi-simple span bridges is an easy alternative for precast PSC girder bridges. However, the existence of expansion joints often leads to a host of problems in their vicinity due to drainage leaks and debris accumulation. The maintenance of expansion joints is, therefore, an activity that bridge owners would rather avoid by eliminating these joints by building connections between precast elements that are capable of resisting the forces resulting from establishing continuity. Several continuity details have been used over the years for slab-on-girder bridges with the goal of avoiding the aforementioned maintenance issues and reaping the benefits of continuity without the drawbacks of introducing it in large structures such as bridges (e.g. thermal movements). A new continuity detail is adopted in the John James Audubon Bridge that differs from the current standard detail in Louisiana. The new detail is based on the recommendation of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 519 [1]. A 96-channel monitoring system was installed to provide information that can be used to assess the performance of the continuity detail. Embedded and surface-mounted sensors of different types were installed to measure strains, temperatures, rotations, and gap openings in critical locations in the monitored segment. Data from about 24 months of monitoring was collected. The data, its processing, and interpretation are presented in this report. Analyses based on NCHRP Report 519 model and finite element models were also conducted to further understand the behavior of the new detail. Results from the analyses were also used to recommend girder age at continuity to meet prespecified design criteria. A live load test was also conducted to assess the performance of the new detail. Recommendations based on the findings of the project are drawn. It can be said that the continuity detail is capable of transferring forces between girder ends. However, girder ends may be subjected to high localized strains, especially due to thermal variation, which can cause cracking. Such cracks are detrimental to the shear strength of PSC girders. Therefore, thermal gradients need to be considered in the design of this detail.

[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator ver 2.1.6

Print this item

  Transfer & Development Lengths in Prestressed Self-Consolidating Concrete Bridge Box
Posted by: mahyarov - 10-29-2012, 07:15 AM - Forum: Bridge (Project and Technology) - No Replies

Transfer & Development Lengths in Prestressed Self-Consolidating Concrete Bridge Box and I-Girders

Author: Andrawes, Bassem | Size: 6.19 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Original preprint | Publisher: University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign | Year: 2011 | pages: 106

[Image: 64665498415644688123.png]


[Image: info.png]

Self-consolidating concrete (SCC) is a workable yet stable concrete which flows easily and consolidates under its own weight. Its unique properties can substantially reduce the labor required to pour complex or heavily reinforced structural members. Over the past decade, the American precast industry has taken significant strides to adopt SCC in commercial projects, though concern about early-age bond behavior has limited the material’s application in prestressed members. A general need remains for further research on the bond properties of SCC in full-scale prestressed members. The wide array of specimen types and SCC mixture designs utilized in practice further underscores this need. To explore the application of SCC in Illinois bridge construction, the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) and Illinois Center for Transportation (ICT) sponsored a three-phase study investigating the bond behavior of steel strands in pretensioned bridge box and I-girders. In the first phase, 56 pullout tests were conducted to compare the performance of seven-wire strands embedded in SCC to that of strands in normally consolidated concrete (NCC) blocks. In the second phase, transfer lengths of prestressing strands in two 28-ft. SCC hollow box girders and two 48-ft. SCC I-girders were determined experimentally. In the third phase, development lengths of strands in the four girders were determined through a series of iterative flexural tests. This report details the experimental program for the study’s three phases and compares results to current requirements of the American Concrete Institute (ACI) and the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). The results of this study may prove fundamental to the safe application of SCC within the state of Illinois’ prestressed concrete industry.

[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator ver 2.1.6

Print this item

  Long-term Maintenance Monitoring Demonstration on a Movable Bridge
Posted by: mahyarov - 10-29-2012, 07:13 AM - Forum: Bridge (Project and Technology) - No Replies

Long-term Maintenance Monitoring Demonstration on a Movable Bridge

Author: Gul, Mustafa | Size: 2.50 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Original preprint | Publisher: University of Central Florida, Orlando | Year: 2011 | pages: 70

[Image: 50944365267283776421.png]


[Image: info.png]

The maintenance costs related to movable bridges are considerably higher than those of fixed bridges, mostly because of the complex interaction of the mechanical, electrical and structural components. A malfunction of any component can cause an unexpected failure of bridge operation, which creates problems for both land and maritime traffic. Maintenance processes associated with the operation system and mechanical parts require special expertise. A comprehensive monitoring system was implemented on Sunrise Bridge (Ft. Lauderdale) to track the behavior and condition of several critical mechanical, electrical and structural components. A number of tests and monitoring of the bridge yielded a wide variety of data, which were analyzed in detail with methods developed by the PI and his research team, and the results obtained at the end of the project were reported to FDOT in a detailed report. After the completion of this previous project, the bridge was already scheduled for painting; however, the monitoring system was significantly damaged during the preparation, sandblasting and painting despite the considerable efforts of FDOT personnel to protect the system. This extension project therefore focuses on repairing the monitoring system, which was affected by the painting operation, collecting and analyzing more data and preparing the system for FDOT. First, details of the field work conducted to repair the damaged monitoring system are presented. Then, analysis of data that were collected after the monitoring system was repaired is presented for different components. The baseline response and the thresholds for acceptable behavior were established. During this phase of the project, unanticipated behaviors were observed for two components (one at the span locks and one at the gearbox) at two different times. These findings indicating the unanticipated behavior using the monitoring system are also corroborated with the independent maintenance reports. These changes in behavior required maintenance work at the span lock and gearbox as given in the maintenance logs. Finally, recommendations are provided based on the findings and experiences from this project.

[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator ver 2.1.6

Print this item

  High Skew Link Slab Bridge System with Deck Sliding over Backwall or Backwall Sliding
Posted by: mahyarov - 10-29-2012, 07:12 AM - Forum: Bridge (Project and Technology) - No Replies

High Skew Link Slab Bridge System with Deck Sliding over Backwall or Backwall Sliding over Abutments

Author: Aktan, Haluk Attanayake, Upul Kahl, Steve | Size: 11 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Original preprint | Publisher: Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo | Year: 2011 | pages: 249

[Image: 38755303022491316339.png]


[Image: info.png]

A new bridge design and construction trend to help improve durability and rideability is to remove expansion joints over piers and abutments. One approach to achieve this is to make the deck continuous over the piers by means of a link slab while the girders remain simply supported. The need to implement link slabs is indicated by American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) section 2.5.2.4 which requires using a minimum number of expansion joints to improve rideability. Further, due to durability concerns associated with bridge deck joints, it is preferred to have a least number of joints or develop jointless decks. The expansion joints over the abutments can be removed by one of three methods: deck sliding over back wall, semi-integral abutments, and integral abutments. This results in expansion joints at either or both ends of the approaches. The design concerns other than link slab include backwall and wing-wall design and bearing movement. The behavior of a jointless bridge brings about many challenges to bridge designers. The complexity is augmented when skew is involved. This report complements an earlier report based on previous research on Combining Link Slab, Deck Sliding Over Backwall and Revising Bearings (Aktan et al., 2008) where the behavior of straight and moderately skew (skew < 200) link slab bridges were investigated and design recommendations were developed. This report describes the behavior and performance of high skew (skew > 200) jointless bridges with link slabs and two abutment configurations. These abutment configurations are deck sliding over backwall and backwall sliding over abutments (i.e. semi-integral abutments). Four tasks were performed in this project. The first task was to review and synthesize information related to the behavior, performance, design, and analysis of skew bridges. The second task was field assessment of skew bridge behavior under static truck loads and thermal loads. The third task was analytical and numerical analysis of skew link slabs. The final task was analytical and numerical analysis of skew sliding deck over backwall systems and semi-integral abutments. Design recommendations are developed based on literature, field assessment data analysis, finite element modeling, and subsequent simulations of the numerous models developed in this project. One recommendation deals with the skew link slab design and the remaining recommendations are for bearing selection and selection and design of a transverse restraint system at abutments of skew link slab bridges.

[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator ver 2.1.6

Print this item

  Combined Seismic Plus Live-Load Analysis of Highway Bridges
Posted by: mahyarov - 10-29-2012, 07:09 AM - Forum: Bridge (Project and Technology) - No Replies

Combined Seismic Plus Live-Load Analysis of Highway Bridges

Author: Scott, Michael H | Size: 4.74 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Original preprint | Publisher: Oregon State University, Corvallis | Year: 2011 | pages: 44

[Image: 65952116800546068895.png]


[Image: info.png]

The combination of seismic and vehicle live loadings on bridges is an important design consideration. There are well-established design provisions for how the individual loadings affect bridge response; structural components that carry vertical live loads are designed to remain well within the linear-elastic range, while lateral load carrying components are designed to yield under large seismic excitations. The weight of the bridge superstructure is taken into account as dead load in structural analysis for seismic loads; however, the effects of additional mass and damping of live loads on the bridge deck are neglected. To improve the design of highway bridges for multi-hazard effects of seismic plus live load, many questions arise and are addressed in this project via numerical simulations of short span bridges. Further extensions of this research can be extended to long span bridges whose seismic response is more heavily influenced by vehicle mass on the bridge deck.

[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator ver 2.1.6

Print this item

  Large-Scale Laboratory Observations of Wave Forces on a Highway Bridge Superstructure
Posted by: mahyarov - 10-29-2012, 07:07 AM - Forum: Bridge (Project and Technology) - No Replies

Large-Scale Laboratory Observations of Wave Forces on a Highway Bridge Superstructure

Author: Bradner, Chris Schumacher, Thomas | Size: 2.84 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Original preprint | Publisher: Oregon State University, Corvallis | Year: 2011 | pages: 170

[Image: 24830051677090661146.png]


[Image: info.png]

The experimental setup and data are presented for a laboratory experiment conducted to examine realistic wave forcing on a highway bridge superstructure. The experiments measure wave conditions along with the resulting forces, pressures, and structural response of a 1:5 scale, reinforced concrete model of a typical section of the I-10 Bridge over Escambia Bay, Florida that failed during Hurricane Ivan in 2004. A unique feature of this model is its roller and rail system which allowed the specimen to move freely along the axis of wave propagation to simulate the dynamic response of the structure. The data are analyzed to study the relative importance of the impulse load versus the sustained wave load, the magnitudes of the horizontal to vertical forces, and their time histories to identify the modes of failure. The thesis examines the relationship between measured forces and wave momentum flux. The measured forces are also compared to recently published AASHTO guidelines. The author evaluates the distribution of forces under random wave conditions and proposes a method that calculates design loads based on exceedance probabilities.

[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator ver 2.1.6

Print this item

  Finite Element Analysis of Deep Wide-Flanged Pre-stressed Girders to Understand and C
Posted by: mahyarov - 10-29-2012, 07:02 AM - Forum: Bridge (Project and Technology) - No Replies

Finite Element Analysis of Deep Wide-Flanged Pre-stressed Girders to Understand and Control End Cracking

Author: Oliva, Michael G | Size: 9.48 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Original preprint | Publisher: University of Wisconsin, Madison | Year: 2011 | pages: 132

[Image: 07274537333275325152.png]


[Image: info.png]

Hundreds of prestressed concrete girders are used each year for building bridges in Wisconsin. The prestress transfer from the prestressing strands to concrete takes place at the girder ends. Characteristic cracks form in this end region during or immediately after detensioning. Potential solutions to control end cracking were examined via finite element models and the impact of each solution on cracking was evaluated. Modifications to reinforcement bar size, debonding ratios, strand cutting sequence and use of draped strand patterns were simulated by the models. The results from different analyses were compared to quantify the success of each method in reducing strains causing girder end cracks. The tension strains leading to cracks of all types were responsive to debonding some of the bottom flange prestressing strands. Bottom flange cracking can be prevented by methodically debonding exterior strands, keeping the draped strands bonded, and evenly distributing the remaining bonded strands over the bottom flange.

[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator ver 2.1.6

Print this item

Pages (2104): « Previous 1 … 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 … 2104 Next »

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB