09-30-2017, 05:39 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-30-2017, 01:21 PM by oanm2000.
Edit Reason: N/A
)
The design of temporary excavation support to Eurocode 7
This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator V2.3.1
- Author(s): Paul David Markham
- Published By: Geotechnical Engineering Volume 165 Issue GE1, ICE Publishing
- Published Year: 2011
- DOI: 10.1680/geng.2012.165.1.3
- Size: 0.426 MB
- Quality: Original Preprint
- Abstract: This paper examines how Eurocode 7 relates to the design of temporary excavation support. It is shown that total stress design and the net available passive resistance method described in Ciria Report 104 can produce inconsistent results, which must be carefully checked for sensitivity to the soil parameter values used. Many temporary excavations are designed using moderately conservative soil parameter values and a limit equilibrium method of analysis with a lumped factor of safety of 1.5. It is concluded that design in accordance with Eurocode 7 produces higher propping forces than design using this approach, but that Eurocode 7 produces propping forces over 60% lower than design in accordance with Ciria Report C580.
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************
This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator V2.3.1