CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association eBooks Journals, Papers and Presentations Simplified Methods for Estimating th e Response of Floors to a Footfall

Simplified Methods for Estimating th e Response of Floors to a Footfall
 TAFATNEB

Professional Member

Registered
Algeria
User ID: 29701
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,197
Threads: 830
Likes: 9,403 in 1,160 posts
Given Likes: 2850
Points:118,565 EP
#1
08-08-2014, 04:01 PM (This post was last modified: 08-08-2014, 08:17 PM by oanm2000.)
Simplified Methods for Estimating th e Response of Floors to a Footfall

Author: C. J. Middleton1 and J. M. W. Brownjohn | Size: 562 KB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | Publisher: Structures Congress 2011 © ASCE 2011 | Year: 2011 | pages: 21

[Image: 03279550113916258076.png]


[Image: info.png]

Floor vibration serviceability has become an area of interest over recent years. Lightweight electronic offices, especially those with slender architectural forms, and high-technology buildings with low vibration environments can often have excessive floor vibration due to human walking. This can result in a floor which is not fit-forpurpose.
There exist a number of design guides which offer simplified formulae toanalyse these floors. However, the simplistic methods are often shown in be inaccurate and inappropriate. The alternative, finite element analysis (FEA), which is often considered more accurate, can be expensive to implement and time consuming. In addition, modelling techniques required for dynamic analyses are different to that required for static analysis. This is often overlooked, resulting in poor inaccurate models. An accurate, simplistic, method is required which is suitable for everyday design.
This paper examines the current simplified methods of predicting floor response to a single human walking. The inaccuracies are highlighted, as well as where the methodology is inappropriate. The paper also introduces new techniques and ideas to improve design guides in the future.


[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator v2.2.0



[-] The following 11 users Like TAFATNEB's post:11 users Like TAFATNEB's post
  • vardan, slowet, jcbv, gulilero, blaze, oanm2000, malc, ruaumoko, RyanRS, draluka, faros3000
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Evaluation Of Earthquake Response Analysis Methods For Low - Rise Base Isolated B. TAFATNEB 0 3,971 09-05-2014, 01:46 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  FOOTFALL INDUCED VIBRATION IN LONGSPAN COMPOSITE STEEL BEAMS USED IN TWO PROJECTS AT TAFATNEB 1 3,220 08-08-2014, 05:35 PM
Last Post: r3be1
  Measurement and modeling of footfall vibrations in a sensitive laboratory facility TAFATNEB 0 2,894 08-08-2014, 04:16 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Passive control methods for seismic response modification lisine 0 3,538 10-15-2012, 10:14 AM
Last Post: lisine
  Seismic response of composite frames—I. Response criteria input motion melkat 0 3,451 01-19-2011, 11:30 AM
Last Post: melkat
  Equivalent Static vs. Response Spectrum A Comparison of Two Methods Veggeta 0 4,018 11-24-2010, 05:13 AM
Last Post: Veggeta
  Limit Period Based on Aproximate Analytical Methods Estimating Inelastic Displacement Ultra Zone 0 3,922 09-18-2009, 04:18 PM
Last Post: Ultra Zone

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode