CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association eBooks Geotechnical Engineering Soil Investigation and Mechanics Group Efficiencies of Grout-Tipped Drilled Shafts and Jet-Grouted Piles

Group Efficiencies of Grout-Tipped Drilled Shafts and Jet-Grouted Piles
 mahyarov

Not-Activated

Iran
User ID: 1197
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 530
Threads: 451
Likes: 3,226 in 534 posts
Given Likes: 1492
Points:47,728 EP
#1
10-27-2012, 07:54 PM
Group Efficiencies of Grout-Tipped Drilled Shafts and Jet-Grouted Piles

Author: McVay, Michael | Size: 11.03 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Original preprint | Publisher: University of Florida, Gainesville | Year: 2011 | pages: 206

[Image: 58522373915348652998.png]


[Image: info.png]

In current practice, driven piles/drilled shafts are constructed in a group at 3D center to center (c/c) spacing to minimize group interference (i.e., group efficiency factor ~ 1) as well as reduce the cost of the reinforced concrete cap. Presently, group efficiency factors for a number of new foundation types, e.g., post-grouted drilled shafts and jet-grouted piles, are unknown. This research looked into the group interaction of post-grouted drilled shafts and jet-grouted piles at typical 3D spacing. Two sets of group tests for grout-tipped drilled shafts and jet-grouted piles were performed in the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) test chamber in medium dense sands. The experimental top down group testing revealed that the jet-grouted piles behaved as a block at 3D spacing, whereas postgrouted drilled shafts acted independently of one another, i.e., no group interaction. A group interaction factor, as well as an analytical approach for predicting load versus displacement for single or group of jet-grouted piles, is suggested. In the case of the grout-tipped drilled shafts, the grout pressure always resulted in an upward flow of grout alongside the shaft which increased both the side and tip areas. The increased areas and grout tip preload were the three factors identified with the increased shaft and group resistance. Due to uncertainty in estimating areas, a conservative design approach for assessing single and group capacities of post-grouted drilled shafts at 5% displacement is proposed. Finally, the use of stage grouting to assess the increase in shaft capacity (skin and tip) is suggested.

[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator ver 2.1.6



[-] The following 5 users Like mahyarov's post:5 users Like mahyarov's post
  • cace-01, PinkPant, Evandrojr, kowheng, ykhackhack
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Modeling of Laterally Loaded Drilled Shafts Behind Mechanically Stabilized Earth Bloc mahyarov 0 700 10-27-2012, 07:44 PM
Last Post: mahyarov
  Design of Inclined Loaded Drilled Shafts in High-Plasticity Clay Environment mahyarov 0 758 10-27-2012, 07:38 PM
Last Post: mahyarov
  Modeling of Pile Footings and Drilled Shafts for Seismic Design mahyarov 0 772 10-27-2012, 06:28 PM
Last Post: mahyarov

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode