CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association eBooks Journals, Papers and Presentations Pros and cons analysis of seismic evaluation

Pros and cons analysis of seismic evaluation
 cve_jule

Not-Activated

Macedonia
User ID: 6973
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 99
Threads: 32
Likes: 888 in 90 posts
Given Likes: 882
Points:5,160 EP
#1
09-02-2011, 12:12 PM (This post was last modified: 09-02-2011, 04:21 PM by oanm2000.)
Pros and cons analysis of seismic evaluation

Author: Helmut Krawinkler, G. D. P. K. Seneviratna | Size: 1.43 MB | Format: PDF | Publisher: Engineering Structures | Year: 1998 | pages: 13

[Image: 28016582942699542979.jpg]


[Image: info.png]

Engineering Structures, Vol. 20, Nos 4-6, pp. 452-464, 1998
O 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd

Helmut Krawinkler
Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
G. D. P. K. Seneviratna
Krawinkler, Luth and Associates, 160 Jefferson Drive, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA

Abstract:
The static pushover analysis is becoming a popular tool for seismic performance evaluation of existing and new structures. The expectation is that the pushover analysis will provide adequate information on seismic demands imposed by the design ground motion on the structural system and its components. The purpose of the paper is to summarize basic concepts on which the pushover analysis can be based, assess the accuracy of pushover predictions, identify conditions under which the pushover will provide adequate information and, perhaps more importantly, identify cases in which the pushover predictions will be inadequate or even misleading.
© 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Keywords: pushover analysis, performance evaluation, inelastic
behavior

[Image: Download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************

Made By CivilEA Post-Generator ver 2.1



[-] The following 15 users Like cve_jule's post:15 users Like cve_jule's post
  • blaze, 3fan, kowheng, malc, Grunf, oanm2000, gulilero, Dell_Brett, ISTRAKTURA, knrsa, zrilek, Ultra Zone, ting tsai huang, Clouseau, RyanRS
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Seismic evaluation of a 56-storey residential reinforced concrete high-rise building anfaga 3 6,115 02-10-2016, 02:49 PM
Last Post: BennyP
  Evaluation of Egyptian code provisions for seismic design of moment-resisting-frame m TAFATNEB 0 3,276 09-05-2014, 02:03 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Evaluation Of Earthquake Response Analysis Methods For Low - Rise Base Isolated B. TAFATNEB 0 3,979 09-05-2014, 01:46 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  The evaluation of impedance functions in the analysis of foundations vibrations using TAFATNEB 1 4,148 08-11-2014, 10:26 AM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Seismic evaluation of fluid-elevated tank-foundation/soil systems in frequency domain TAFATNEB 0 3,086 05-10-2014, 08:32 AM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Vulnerability evaluation and seismic rehabilitation of steel building with semi-rigid TAFATNEB 0 2,711 05-09-2014, 10:22 AM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Evaluation of the seismic performance of a three-story ordinary moment-resisting conc TAFATNEB 0 2,920 04-26-2014, 06:25 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode