CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association eBooks Journals, Papers and Presentations Cable-Based Retrofit of Steel Building Floors to Prevent Progressive Collapse

Cable-Based Retrofit of Steel Building Floors to Prevent Progressive Collapse
 usman

Professional Member

Protectors
United Nations
User ID: 59
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 717
Threads: 138
Likes: 6,571 in 671 posts
Given Likes: 4974
Points:35,696 EP
#1
11-01-2010, 09:55 PM
Cable-Based Retrofit of Steel Building Floors to Prevent Progressive Collapse
by Samuel Tan, Albolhassan Astaneh-Asl

[Image: 21077390178061577425.jpg]

[Image: 13246271607090092067.jpg]

Abstract

The project summarized here was the third phase of a three-phase research and development project. Phases 1 and 2 focused on new buildings while the third phase, discussed in this report, was primarily for the retrofit of existing buildings. The two main objectives of this study were:

1. To establish inherent strength of typical floor framing systems in steel structures to resist progressive collapse in the event of removal of a column by a bomb blast and;
2. To develop and test cable-based mechanisms that can be used to prevent progressive collapse in the event of removal of a façade column.

The test specimen was a single-story steel frame with composite floor slab. The specimen measured approximately 60 ft (20 m) by 20 ft (6 m) by 6.5 ft (2 m) tall. The steel floor beams were supported by ten wide-flange columns. The beam-to-column connections in the test area were typical shear tabs (single plates). Two columns in the middle span of the specimen were designed and constructed as drop columns. These drop columns terminated 36 inches (1 m) above the laboratory floor. During testing, the support of drop columns could be removed and a vertical downward displacement could be imposed upon these drop columns. Subsequently, the floor displaced downward under gravity load and developed tensile forces due to catenary action. This project investigated the capacity of an existing steel frame structure, retrofitted with high strength steel cables, to resist progressive collapse by developing catenary action in its floor framing members.

Three tests were conducted on the specimen. In the first test, the specimen represented a typical steel structure without any mechanism to prevent progressive collapse. The second and third tests represented the structure after two steel cables were placed on the web of the façade beams, one at each corner of web-flange intersection as a retrofit measure. The cables were anchored to the last column on each end of the floor. The columns transferred the tension force of the cable to the floor framing and the floor slab. The cables acting in a catenary action mode added to the strength of the system and prevented progressive collapse of the floor after removal of the middle column. The mechanisms performed well in the tests and proved to be very efficient and economical in preventing progressive collapse of the tested specimen.

Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************
6.5MB single PDF
stone age was not finished due to lack of stones. . . . . .tEChNOlOGY Changed



[-] The following 5 users Like usman's post:5 users Like usman's post
  • oanm2000, shanta, triance, kowheng, Dell_Brett
 ssobhan

Not-Activated

Iran
User ID: 1054
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,314
Threads: 335
Likes: 8,975 in 1,182 posts
Given Likes: 2465
Points:43,841 EP
#2
03-03-2012, 07:33 AM
Direct Link:
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************



[-] The following 12 users Like ssobhan's post:12 users Like ssobhan's post
  • vvvv, blaze, jcbv, kowheng, lisine, oram, Jackass, Dell_Brett, warbeast, zrilek, gulilero, malc
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Progressive collapse analysis of an RC building with exterior partially infilled wall asim99 1 4,812 03-01-2017, 04:02 PM
Last Post: pezhmankhan
  CTV Building Collapse - NLTHA Report - Christchurch Earthquake 2011 jamesmakeez 0 3,337 10-28-2016, 03:23 AM
Last Post: jamesmakeez
  RESPONSE ANALYSIS STUDY OF A BASE-ISOLATED BUILDING BASED ON SEISMIC CODES WORLDWIDE TAFATNEB 0 3,464 08-10-2014, 01:15 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Progressive Collapse of Multi-Storey Buildings due to Sudden Column Loss –Part II: Ap TAFATNEB 0 3,821 05-09-2014, 02:00 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Retrofit Methods to Mitigate Progressive Collapse TAFATNEB 0 3,905 05-09-2014, 11:44 AM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Seismic Retrofit of a Cable-S tayed Bridge with Passive Control Techniques: A Comp ar TAFATNEB 0 3,208 05-02-2014, 09:08 AM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Progressive Collapse of Bridges—As pects of Analysis and Design TAFATNEB 0 3,339 05-02-2014, 09:02 AM
Last Post: TAFATNEB

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode