CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association eBooks Journals, Papers and Presentations ASCE-41 and FEMA-351 Evaluation of E-Defense Collapse Test

ASCE-41 and FEMA-351 Evaluation of E-Defense Collapse Test
 TAFATNEB

Professional Member

Registered
Algeria
User ID: 29701
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,197
Threads: 830
Likes: 9,403 in 1,160 posts
Given Likes: 2850
Points:118,565 EP
#1
04-26-2014, 11:22 AM
ASCE-41 and FEMA-351 Evaluation of E-Defense Collapse Test

Author: Bruce F. Maison, a) M.EERI, Kazuhiko Kasai, b) M.EERI, and Gregory Deierlein, c) M.EERI | Size: 1.1 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | Publisher: Earthquake Spectra, Volume 25, No. 4, pages 927–953, November 2009; © 2009, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute | Year: 2009 | pages: 27

[Image: 43060132056316913589.jpg]


[Image: info.png]

A welded steel moment-frame building is used to assess performancebased engineering guidelines. The full-scale four-story building was shaken to collapse on the E-Defense shake table in Japan. The collapse mode was a side-sway mechanism in the first story, which occurred in spite of a strongcolumn and weak-beam design. Computer analyses were conducted to simulate the building response during the experiment. The building was then evaluated using the Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings (ASCE-41) and Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteria for Existing Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings (FEMA-351) for the collapse prevention performance level via linear and nonlinear procedures. The guidelines had mixed results regarding the characterization of collapse, and no single approach was superior. They mostly erred on the safe side by predicting collapse at shaking intensities less than that in the experiment. Recommendations are made for guideline improvements.


[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator v2.2.0



[-] The following 11 users Like TAFATNEB's post:11 users Like TAFATNEB's post
  • zrilek, ting tsai huang, blaze, vardan, malc, ykhackhack, duazo2009, LiviuM, draluka, faros3000, febo927
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  ASTM - Apparatus and Procedure for an In Situ Collapse Test mybest 0 2,701 06-18-2013, 02:58 PM
Last Post: mybest
  Evaluation of progressive collapse potential of multi-story moment resisting steel fr asim99 0 3,382 05-20-2013, 04:58 AM
Last Post: asim99
  EVALUATION OF BEARING CAPACITY OF PILES FROM CONE PENETRATION TEST DATA shadabg 0 3,595 09-18-2012, 06:32 AM
Last Post: shadabg

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode