APPLICATION OF PUSHOVER ANALYSIS METHODS FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES
Current time: 04-24-2018, 03:53 AM
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Author: TAFATNEB
Last Post: andersen3
Replies 1
Views 1510

APPLICATION OF PUSHOVER ANALYSIS METHODS FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES
#1
APPLICATION OF PUSHOVER ANALYSIS METHODS FOR BUILDING STRUCTURES

Author: A. Kiran1 , G. Ghosh2 and Y. K.Gupta3 | Size: 0.2 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | Publisher: ISET GOLDEN JUBILEE SYMPOSIUM Indian Society of Earthquake Technology Department of Earthquake Engineering Building IIT Roorkee, | Year: Roorkee October 20-21, 2012 | pages: 6


[Image: info.png]

To have a reliable estimate of the performance of a structure, sophisticated analytical tools are necessary. Nonlinear
dynamic analysis is the most accurate method available for the analysis of structures subjected to earthquake excitation. Nonlinear static (Pushover) Analysis is also an attractive choice because of its simplicity and ability to identify component and system-level deformation demands with accuracy comparable to dynamic analysis. Many methods have evolved, over the years, for pushover analysis of structures. People have a lot of doubt about which one of those will be the most preferred pushover method for the analysis of structures. To fulfill that objective, in the
present study, a comparison has been made between the results of the pushover analysis with the dynamic timehistory
analysis, with a view to find out the most preferred pushover method. The existing pushover analysis methods as per the literatures and codes have been considered in the study. For the analysis purpose, two types of building structures have been considered. It has been observed that in most of the cases, pushover analysis results are conservative as compared to the time history results. It has been observed that in most of the cases ELM method of FEMA 440 gives good result in comprasion to time history analysis.


[Image: mirror.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


[-] The following 14 users say Thank You to TAFATNEB for this post:
  • vardan, blaze, Sumatra, rezart, jcbv, malc, ting tsai huang, gulilero, ruaumoko, ykhackhack, subin91, ali akbar, jamesmakeez, sructme
Reply
#2
direct link
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************
[-] The following 8 users say Thank You to andersen3 for this post:
  • ykhackhack, jcbv, ali akbar, knrsa, slowet, learner20, jamesmakeez, yanburak
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
The application of ABAQUS in seismic analysis of connected structures TAFATNEB 0 1,489 12-26-2014, 10:40 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
Pushover Analysis of I-5 RAVENNA Bridge TAFATNEB 0 1,178 08-14-2014, 09:26 AM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
Modal Pushover Analysis of SAC Buildings TAFATNEB 0 1,026 04-26-2014, 07:15 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
Pushover Analysis of 4 Storey’s Reinforced Concrete Building TAFATNEB 0 1,290 04-09-2014, 07:14 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
3D PUSHOVER ANALYSIS: THE ISSUE OF TORSION TAFATNEB 1 1,250 11-25-2013, 08:13 AM
Last Post: andersen3



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)