Structural Capacity of Rammed Earth in Compression
Author: Maniatidis Vasilios, Walker Peter | Size: 0.97 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Original preprint | Publisher: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 20, Issue 3 | Year: Mar2008, | pages: p230-238, 9p | ISSN: 0899-1561
Rammed earth walls are formed by compacting subsoil in thin layers inside temporary supporting formwork. An ancient form of construction, rammed earth has in recent years, together with other earth building methods, been increasingly used structurally in a range of contemporary buildings in many countries around the world. Though current structural design procedures for earth walls, including rammed earth, in general use provisions based on structural masonry standards, this approach has never been satisfactorily validated. This paper presents experimental results from material and large-scale testing and develops a simple theoretical model, applied to rammed earth columns subject to concentric and eccentric axial compression loading. An analytical model, using a basic strut theory, shows favorable correlation with the experimental results for all load eccentricities.
Soil Property Criteria for Rammed Earth Stabilization
Author: Burroughs Steve | Size: 0.39 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Original preprint | Publisher: Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 20, Issue 3 | Year: Mar2008, | pages: p264-273, 10p | ISBN: 0899-1561
This study relates value ranges of natural soil properties (plasticity, texture, and shrinkage) to the degree of predisposition of soils to stabilization for rammed earth wall construction. A total of 219 strength determinations were made on 104 soils compacted and stabilized with cement and/or lime and/or asphalt. Using a 2 MPa compressive strength criterion as the measure of stabilization success, soil property value ranges were related to the proportion of samples exceeding the criterion. Linear shrinkage (LS) and plasticity index (PI) are found to be the best discriminators of soil predisposition, with textural variables being useful secondary discriminators. “Favorable” soils, with stabilization success rates of ≥80%, include those with: (1) LS<6.0% and PI<15%; and (2) LS 6.0–11.0%, PI 15–30%, and sand content <64%. These soils were stabilized with treatments averaging 4.2% cement and 1.8% lime, with individual treatments ranging from 4–8% total cement and/or lime. “Unfavorable” soils, with stabilization success rates of <60%, include those with LS 6.0–11.0, PI 15–30, and sand content ≥64%, or with LS>11.0, PI>30. These findings should assist rammed earth engineers to more easily select a suitable soil and to minimize resources spent on preconstruction stabilization trials.
Both papers inside 1.16Mb Rar file / no pass.
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************