CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association eBooks Journals, Papers and Presentations Seismic performance of concrete frame structures reinforced with superelastic shape

Seismic performance of concrete frame structures reinforced with superelastic shape
 TAFATNEB

Professional Member

Registered
Algeria
User ID: 29701
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,197
Threads: 830
Likes: 9,403 in 1,160 posts
Given Likes: 2850
Points:118,565 EP
#1
09-05-2014, 01:59 PM (This post was last modified: 09-06-2014, 09:24 AM by lisine.)
Seismic performance of concrete frame structures reinforced with superelastic shape memory alloys

Author: M. Shahria Alam, Moncef Nehdi* and Maged A. Youssef | Size: 03 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | Publisher: Smart Structures and Systems, Vol. 5, No. 5 (2009) 565-585 | Year: 2009 | pages: 21

[Image: info.png]
Abstract. Superelastic Shape Memory Alloys (SMAs) are gaining acceptance for use as reinforcing bars in
concrete structures. The seismic behaviour of concrete frames reinforced with SMAs is being assessed in this
study. Two eight-storey concrete frames, one of which is reinforced with regular steel and the other with SMAs at
the plastic hinge regions of beams and regular steel elsewhere, are designed and analyzed using 10 different
ground motion records. Both frames are located in the highly seismic region of Western Canada and are designed
and detailed according to current seismic design standards. The validation of a finite element (FE) program that
was conducted previously at the element level is extended to the structure level in this paper using the results of a
shake table test of a three-storey moment resisting steel RC frame. The ten accelerograms that are chosen for
analyzing the designed RC frames are scaled based on the spectral ordinate at the fundamental periods of the
frames. The behaviour of both frames under scaled seismic excitations is compared in terms of maximum interstorey
drift, top-storey drift, inter-storey residual drift, and residual top-storey drift. The results show that SMA-
RC frames are able to recover most of its post-yield deformation, even after a strong earthquake.


[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator v2.2.0



[-] The following 5 users Like TAFATNEB's post:5 users Like TAFATNEB's post
  • cace-01, vardan, zrilek, malc, blaze
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Experiment and Analysis on X-Shaped Reinforced Concrete Joint in Diagrid Structures asim99 1 4,525 04-20-2018, 05:19 PM
Last Post: munycamsec
  Assessment of Shear Wall Building Seismic Performance by Nonlinear Analysis benny 2 9,767 08-01-2017, 09:19 AM
Last Post: abdulazizk
  Performance-based seismic assessment of skewed bridges bridgeengineer 0 3,240 04-22-2016, 06:31 AM
Last Post: bridgeengineer
  Seismic evaluation of a 56-storey residential reinforced concrete high-rise building anfaga 3 6,099 02-10-2016, 02:49 PM
Last Post: BennyP
  2nd ATC-SEI Conference on Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and RyanRS 0 3,547 10-29-2015, 12:55 AM
Last Post: RyanRS
  Assessment of the seismic performance of a bituminous faced rockfill dam Wolverine883 0 4,221 07-19-2015, 07:24 AM
Last Post: Wolverine883
  Seismic Design of Concrete Structures - The Present Needs of Societies RyanRS 0 4,272 05-17-2015, 05:49 AM
Last Post: RyanRS

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode