CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association eBooks Journals, Papers and Presentations SIMPLIFIED P-y RELATIONSHIPS FOR MODELING EMBANKMENT- ABUTMENT SYSTEMS OF TYPICAL CAL

SIMPLIFIED P-y RELATIONSHIPS FOR MODELING EMBANKMENT- ABUTMENT SYSTEMS OF TYPICAL CAL
 TAFATNEB

Professional Member

Registered
Algeria
User ID: 29701
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,197
Threads: 830
Likes: 9,403 in 1,160 posts
Given Likes: 2850
Points:118,565 EP
#1
06-03-2014, 07:10 AM
SIMPLIFIED P-y RELATIONSHIPS FOR MODELING EMBANKMENT- ABUTMENT SYSTEMS OF TYPICAL CALIFORNIA BRIDGES

Author: SEXTOS, Anastasios , MACKIE, Kevin , STOJADINOVIC , Bozidar and TASKARI, Olympia | Size: 1.4 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | Publisher: The 14 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China | Year: 2008 | pages: 08

[Image: 86868580877033799600.jpg]


[Image: info.png]

The flexibility οf the embankment-abutment stiffness has been found to drastically effect the seismic response
of the entire bridge, typically depending on the intensity of earthquake ground motion, but also on the
geometrical and mechanical properties of embankment-abutment system. Consequently, significant effort has
been made to incorporate the nonlinear behavior of the lateral support of the deck primarily through inelastic
static (pushover) analysis. However, the difficulties in modeling the nonlinear behavior of soil as well as the
computationally demanding three-dimensional geometry often lead to the disregard of some sources of
nonlinearity such as those associated with the foundation soil and the boundary conditions at bridge abutments.
Along these lines, the scope of this paper is to model and study the nonlinear response of six typical Californian
abutment-embankment systems to derive specific force-deflection (i.e., P-y) relationships as a function of
foundation soil properties, abutment type, and embankment geometry within the framework of an alternative
simplified method proposed by Kappos et al. (2007). Comparative assessment of the current Caltrans guidelines
is also performed and design recommendations are made.


[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator v2.2.0



[-] The following 8 users Like TAFATNEB's post:8 users Like TAFATNEB's post
  • blaze, brandizzo, ting tsai huang, daywalker, vardan, zrilek, SCREAM7890, malc
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Behavior, Modeling and Design of Shear Wall-Frame Systems preceptor 6 9,337 12-03-2012, 01:24 PM
Last Post: david-smith
  NYDOT: Guidelines For Embankment Construction mybest 0 3,075 04-16-2012, 10:07 AM
Last Post: mybest
  SIMULATION-BASED FRAGILITY RELATIONSHIPS FOR UNREINFORCED MASONRY BUILDINGS JUANCM 0 4,054 10-04-2010, 06:52 PM
Last Post: JUANCM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode