CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Connect with your social network account

Civil Engineering Association eBooks Journals, Papers and Presentations VULNERABILITY TO PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE OF SEISMICALLY DESIGNED RC FRAMED STRUCTURES: C

VULNERABILITY TO PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE OF SEISMICALLY DESIGNED RC FRAMED STRUCTURES: C
 TAFATNEB

Professional Member

Registered
Algeria
User ID: 29701
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,153
Threads: 798
Likes: 9,131 in 1,118 posts
Given Likes: 2774
Points: 115,285 EP

#1
04-26-2014, 11:22 AM
VULNERABILITY TO PROGRESSIVE COLLAPSE OF SEISMICALLY DESIGNED RC FRAMED STRUCTURES: CORNER COLUMN CASE

Author: ADRIAN-MIRCEA IOANI and HORTENSIU-LIVIU CUCU | Size: 746 KB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | Publisher: BULETINUL INSTITUTULUI POLITEHNIC DIN IAŞI Publicat de Universitatea Tehnică „Gheorghe Asachi” din Iaşi Tomul LVI (LX), Fasc. 4, 2010 Secţia CONSTRUCŢII. ĂRHITECTURĂ | Year: 2010 | pages: 10

[Image: 90357033962351107428.png]


[Image: info.png]

Abstract. As in the seismic design, to resist such catastrophic loads, structures should be provided with an adequate level of structural continuity, redundancy,
robustness and ductility, so that alternative load transfer paths can develop when the structure loses an individual member. Following the GSA Guidelines (2003), the paper
presents an investigation regarding the vulnerability to progressive collapse of a model
representing a 13-storey RC framed building when its seismic design was made
according to the provisions of the present seismic code P100-1/2006. . Numerical results
regarding the behavior of the model when the structure is damaged by the sudden removal of a corner column are given. Demands and capacities of structural members are assessed and DCR values for the lower part of the building are presented. A typical medium–rise building having RC frames seismically designed for Bucharest according to seismic design code P100-1/2006, does not experience failures or progressive collapse when subjected to different “missing column” scenarios, including the removal of a
corner column.


[Image: download.png]
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************



This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator v2.2.0



[-] The following 6 users Like TAFATNEB's post:6 users Like TAFATNEB's post
  • blaze, malc, slowet, zrilek, rezart, vardan
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Vulnerability, Uncertainty, and Risk: Analysis, Modeling, and Management i_kabir 3 4,080 07-11-2020, 05:18 PM
Last Post: ska51
  Progressive collapse analysis of an RC building with exterior partially infilled wall asim99 1 3,977 03-01-2017, 05:02 PM
Last Post: pezhmankhan
  Experimental studies of the ultimate behavior of seismically-isolated structures arshiakh 0 2,285 08-13-2014, 04:37 PM
Last Post: arshiakh
  SEISMIC VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT USING AMBIENT VIBRATIONS: METHOD AND VALIDATION TAFATNEB 0 2,510 08-12-2014, 10:15 AM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  EXPERIMENTAL MULTI-LEVEL SEISMIC PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF 3D RC FRAME DESIGNED FOR D TAFATNEB 0 2,256 06-03-2014, 10:01 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode