CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association eBooks General Books Civil Engineering MSc and PhD thesis Seismic Retrofitting w/ Cost Effectiveness: SBF, SMF, Conc. Shear Wall & Conc. Mo. Fr

Seismic Retrofitting w/ Cost Effectiveness: SBF, SMF, Conc. Shear Wall & Conc. Mo. Fr
 asim99

Not-Activated

Pakistan
User ID: 9774
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 603
Threads: 476
Likes: 6,383 in 594 posts
Given Likes: 377
Points:54,091 EP
#1
02-26-2013, 05:09 PM
SEISMIC RETROFITTING WITH COST EFFECTIVENESS: STEEL BRACED FRAME, STEEL MOMENT FRAME, CONCRETE SHEAR WALL, CONCRETE MOMENT FRAME

Author: Han Sang Kim | Size: 2.19 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | Publisher: Han Sang Kim | Year: 2012 | pages: 211

[Image: 98089881836555247228.jpg]


[Image: info.png]

Located in the heart of Los Angeles, USC is considered an earthquake prone zone, and
there is a vital imperative to ensure the safety of all students and faculties during such
an event. In order to prevent casualties, buildings must be checked and assured to
perform under design loads.
Under the current California Building Code (CBC), engineers must design all structural
members for new buildings to meet CBC 2010 standards. However, designing to simply
meet the standards cannot ensure the safety of the building and its occupants as seismic
loads in earthquakes cannot be predicted and can exceed building code expectations.
When retro‐fitting of existing buildings (designed under earlier, less stringent codes) is
considered, the CBC 2010 standards may be applied with the same caveat.
This study considers structural retrofit systems for existing buildings, taking into account
economic as well as structural factors. Two USC buildings, Waite Phillips Hall (WPH), a
12‐story classroom/office building, and Webb Tower (WTO), a 14‐story residential
building, were chosen as case‐studies to represent mid‐size buildings constructed in the
Los Angeles area. Four hypothetical structural systems for retrofit were studied: steel
braced frame, steel moment frame, concrete shear wall core, and concrete moment
frame systems. In accordance to design earthquake loads, the different systems’

[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator ver 2.1.6



[-] The following 10 users Like asim99's post:10 users Like asim99's post
  • blaze, mahyarov, cace-01, malc, Dell_Brett, ASEC, kowheng, narendra, subin91, tluc
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Seismic Performance Assessment and Probabilistic Repair Cost Analysis of Precast Conc TAFATNEB 0 731 07-03-2015, 10:30 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Inelastic seismic response of precast concrete large panel coupled shear wall sys TAFATNEB 0 882 03-27-2015, 11:44 AM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  STEEL DISSIPATIVE BRACING SYSTEMS FOR SEISMIC RETROFITTING OF EXISTING STRUCT TAFATNEB 0 893 10-08-2014, 02:17 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  SEISMIC BEHAVIOUR OF STEEL PLATE SHEAR WALLS TAFATNEB 0 864 10-08-2014, 02:00 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  the contribution of no structural component to the overall dynamic behavior of conc TAFATNEB 0 615 08-08-2014, 04:11 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  SEISMIC SHEAR DEMAND IN HIGH-RISE CONCRETE WALLS TAFATNEB 0 769 05-30-2014, 02:05 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  SEISMIC DESIGN, TESTING AND ANALYSIS OF REINFORCED CONCRETE WALL BUILDINGS TAFATNEB 0 903 05-09-2014, 04:36 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode