CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association eBooks General Books Civil Engineering MSc and PhD thesis Comparative Response of Mid-Rise Base-Isolated & Conventional SMRF Buildings

Comparative Response of Mid-Rise Base-Isolated & Conventional SMRF Buildings
 asim99

Not-Activated

Pakistan
User ID: 9774
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 603
Threads: 476
Likes: 6,383 in 594 posts
Given Likes: 377
Points:54,091 EP
#1
02-26-2013, 04:53 PM
COMPARATIVE RESPONSE OF MID-RISE BASE-ISOLATED AND CONVENTIONAL STEEL MOMENT RESISTING FRAME BUILDINGS

Author: Yumei Jiang | Size: 0.5 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | Publisher: Yumei Jiang | Year: 2012 | pages: 116

[Image: 37578055507921253653.jpg]


[Image: info.png]

Base isolation systems are preferably applied in low-rise buildings since the
vibration period of the structure can be shorter, so that it performs more rigidly to
maximize the benefit from the isolation system. Mid-rise and high-rise base-isolated
buildings are expected to have different and variable response characteristics compared to
low-rise base-isolated buildings, and may not perform as well as low-rise or relatively
stiffer base-isolated buildings. However, in this study, the benefit of seismic isolation in a
9-story is comparable or even better than a low-rise (3-story) isolated building that was
investigated thoroughly in a previous study (Sayani et al. 2011) with respect to peak floor
acceleration, peak story drifts, and peak plastic rotation.
A pair of 9-story isolated and conventional buildings were designed by
Forell/Elsesser, using the same design philosophy as 3-story buildings that were
investigated earlier. Both 9-story and 3-story buildings were designed to satisfactorily
meet the current building code standards (ASCE 2005). OpenSees and SAP 2000 were
used to develop analytical models of the 9-story buildings for independent purposes. The
SAP model was used primarily for model analysis and to perform a design check with
standard response spectrum analysis procedures. The OpenSees model was used for
nonlinear pushover analysis and nonlinear response history analysis to suites of ground
motions representing various probability of occurrence events.

[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator ver 2.1.6



[-] The following 11 users Like asim99's post:11 users Like asim99's post
  • blaze, mahyarov, cace-01, malc, Dell_Brett, kowheng, chandra1234567, gacella, vangjo, ali akbar, nickycruz
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Critical Comparative Feature Analysis Of Structural Software (Sap2000 And Staad.Pro) rezart 0 849 05-23-2016, 05:44 PM
Last Post: rezart
  Advanced Modeling and Evaluation of the Response of Base-Isolated Nuclear Facility St TAFATNEB 0 694 05-09-2014, 05:42 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Three-Dimensional Analysis of Base-Isolated Structures TAFATNEB 0 774 12-20-2013, 11:05 AM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Seismic risk computation for the base - isolated reactor building of the IRIS NPP TAFATNEB 0 665 12-20-2013, 10:09 AM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Optimum design of base isolated RC structures TAFATNEB 0 723 12-20-2013, 09:41 AM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  COMPARISON OF DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEISMICALLY ISOLATED BUILDINGS TAFATNEB 1 952 11-20-2013, 06:56 AM
Last Post: andersen3
  Principles and Practices of Seismic Isolated Buildings TAFATNEB 0 747 11-19-2013, 11:33 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode