CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association eBooks General Books Civil Engineering MSc and PhD thesis COMPARISON OF DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEISMICALLY ISOLATED BUILDINGS

COMPARISON OF DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEISMICALLY ISOLATED BUILDINGS
 TAFATNEB

Professional Member

Registered
Algeria
User ID: 29701
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,197
Threads: 830
Likes: 9,403 in 1,160 posts
Given Likes: 2850
Points:118,565 EP
#1
11-19-2013, 08:54 PM
COMPARISON OF DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEISMICALLY ISOLATED BUILDINGS

Author: EMRE ACAR | Size: 1.8 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | Publisher: A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY | Year: 2006 | pages: 123

[Image: 63751562366050032210.png]


[Image: info.png]

This study presents information on the design procedure of seismic base isolation systems. Analysis of the seismic responses of isolated structures, which is oriented to give a clear understanding of the effect of base isolation on the nature of the structure; and discussion of various isolator types are involved in this work. Seismic isolation consists essentially of the installation of mechanisms, which vdecouple the structure, and its contents, from potentially damaging earthquake induced ground motions. This decoupling is achieved by increasing the horizontal flexibility of the system, together with providing appropriate damping. The isolatorvincreases the natural period of the overall structure and hence decreases itsvacceleration response to earthquake-generated vibrations. This increase in period,


[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator v2.2.0



[-] The following 9 users Like TAFATNEB's post:9 users Like TAFATNEB's post
  • rezart, ykhackhack, malc, ting tsai huang, cace-01, blaze, RyanRS, fred2010, joker™
 andersen3

Not-Activated

White-private
User ID: 464
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 984
Threads: 54
Likes: 6,117 in 996 posts
Given Likes: 1243
Points:29,008 EP
#2
11-20-2013, 06:56 AM
direct link
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************



[-] The following 4 users Like andersen3's post:4 users Like andersen3's post
  • vardan, jcbv, RyanRS, gulilero
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Optimum design of base isolated RC structures TAFATNEB 0 727 12-20-2013, 09:41 AM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Principles and Practices of Seismic Isolated Buildings TAFATNEB 0 747 11-19-2013, 11:33 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Comparative Response of Mid-Rise Base-Isolated & Conventional SMRF Buildings asim99 0 746 02-26-2013, 04:53 PM
Last Post: asim99
  DESIGN COMPARISON OF R.C.C. & COMPOSITE STRUCTURES niki102 1 1,600 07-23-2011, 07:17 AM
Last Post: niki102

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode