CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association eBooks Journals, Papers and Presentations Implications of vertical mass modeling errors on 2D dynamic structural analysis

Implications of vertical mass modeling errors on 2D dynamic structural analysis
 asim99

Not-Activated

Pakistan
User ID: 9774
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 603
Threads: 476
Likes: 6,383 in 594 posts
Given Likes: 377
Points:54,091 EP
#1
12-29-2012, 12:16 AM
Implications of vertical mass modeling errors on 2D dynamic structural analysis

Author: TIMOTHY M. WHALEN, GRAHAM C. ARCHER AND KISHOR M. BHATIA | Size: 520 KB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | Publisher: TIMOTHY M. WHALEN, GRAHAM C. ARCHER AND KISHOR M. BHATIA | Year: 2004 | pages: 10

[Image: 38902262367070501260.jpg]


[Image: info.png]

The use of diagonal (lumped) mass matrices is common in dynamic structural analysis. The assumptions made
when performing the lumping procedure, however, are not always consistent with the underlying physical behavior
and can therefore modify the dynamic properties of the modeled structure. The influence of errors in mass
modeling for vertical degrees of freedom on dynamic behavior and seismic response is illustrated. We demonstrate
that overestimation of the lumped masses associated with vertical displacements in 2D frame models of
these structures leads to inaccurate modal periods and associated modal participation factors for dynamic response.
The ramifications of these inaccuracies on seismic response are shown and implications in other dynamic analysis
situations are discussed.

[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator ver 2.1.6



[-] The following 6 users Like asim99's post:6 users Like asim99's post
  • kowheng, ting tsai huang, malc, blaze, jcbv, Dell_Brett
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Comparison of Static and Dynamic Pushover Analysis in Assessment of the Target Displa TAFATNEB 0 3,277 08-10-2014, 02:42 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Dynamic Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Building with Plan Irregularities TAFATNEB 0 3,482 05-30-2014, 01:43 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Comparison between Static and Dynamic Analysis of Elevated Water Tank” TAFATNEB 0 3,929 05-10-2014, 09:18 AM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Dynamic Finite-Element Analysis of Jointed Concrete Pavements TAFATNEB 0 3,870 03-31-2014, 10:46 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Effect of modeling range on structural analysis for powerhouse of hydroelectric power arshiakh 0 2,792 01-20-2014, 07:53 AM
Last Post: arshiakh
  Dynamic analysis of buildings for earthquake- resistant design TAFATNEB 0 3,382 12-20-2013, 12:19 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings TAFATNEB 1 3,790 11-25-2013, 07:32 AM
Last Post: andersen3

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode