CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association eBooks Journals, Papers and Presentations Seismic Performance of Hollow Core Floor Systems

Seismic Performance of Hollow Core Floor Systems
 ir_71

Not-Activated

Bulgaria
User ID: 25068
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,980
Threads: 1,298
Likes: 25,490 in 1,924 posts
Given Likes: 414
Points:178,871 EP
#1
03-10-2011, 05:49 AM
Seismic Performance of Hollow Core Floor Systems

Size: 2.34 MB | Format: PDF | Year: 2009 | pages: 172

[Image: 36075241440890662493.jpg]


[Image: info.png]

The Guidelines are intended to be read in conjunction with NZS 3101:2006, the Concrete Structures Standard and apply to any building with hollow-core floors, whether new or existing. They apply whether or not the building is earthquake-prone or subject to alteration or change of use. The underlying theme of the guidelines is for the structural performance of the hollow-core floor system to comply with the Building Code requirements under full earthquake loading – whether or not this is achieved in a particular case. The Guidelines address the following issues:
• Structure type and implications: Earthquake performance of hollow-core floors is critically dependent on the displacement the structure experiences and the forces that are induced. For example, ductile frame structures will have higher inter-storey displacements than shear wall structures. In addition, supporting beams may be subject to beam elongation due to plastic hinge formation. However, even in shear wall structures, deformations of the structure can lead to excessive strains on the floor units and/or topping.
• Range of floor systems (floor units plus supporting structure): There is a variety of configurations used. Floor unit depth and span varies. Units may span past intermediate columns. They may be supported on walls or beams. Each configuration may have different implications for the structural performance overall.
• Seating details / performance: Seating details in buildings constructed over the last 30 years vary considerably – from those with generous overlap of unit with the support to those with “negative” overlap that rely on reinforcement in the cores of the units. The behaviour of the floor overall is critically dependent on the detailing of the seating details and associated reinforcement.
• Reinforcement details / performance: Reinforcement is needed for diaphragm action and for bending action in the units. The nature of hollow-core floor units is such that the placement and quantity of reinforcement has a critical influence on overall floor performance. More reinforcement does not necessarily give better performance due to the brittle nature of some failure mechanisms.
Structural Engineering Society of New Zealand
New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering
New Zealand Concrete Society

[Image: Download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************

Made By CivilEA Post-Generator ver 2.0



[-] The following 11 users Like ir_71's post:11 users Like ir_71's post
  • kowheng, zrilek, blaze, Grunf, Dell_Brett, melkat, peixoto, jcoronellr, seriousboy, zainseiya, asimkk
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Assessment of Shear Wall Building Seismic Performance by Nonlinear Analysis benny 2 9,773 08-01-2017, 09:19 AM
Last Post: abdulazizk
  Performance-based seismic assessment of skewed bridges bridgeengineer 0 3,252 04-22-2016, 06:31 AM
Last Post: bridgeengineer
  2nd ATC-SEI Conference on Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and RyanRS 0 3,556 10-29-2015, 12:55 AM
Last Post: RyanRS
  Assessment of the seismic performance of a bituminous faced rockfill dam Wolverine883 0 4,228 07-19-2015, 07:24 AM
Last Post: Wolverine883
  Seminar Achieving Seismic Performance in Steel Connections RyanRS 2 6,203 09-22-2014, 09:21 PM
Last Post: inge911
  Seismic performance of concrete frame structures reinforced with superelastic shape TAFATNEB 0 4,221 09-05-2014, 01:59 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  EXPERIMENTAL MULTI-LEVEL SEISMIC PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF 3D RC FRAME DESIGNED FOR D TAFATNEB 0 2,922 06-03-2014, 09:01 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode