CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association eBooks Environmental Engineering Complementary Approaches for Using Ecotoxicity Data in Soil Pollution Evaluation

Complementary Approaches for Using Ecotoxicity Data in Soil Pollution Evaluation
 xxrr

Not-Activated

White-private
User ID: 16602
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 29
Threads: 17
Likes: 248 in 28 posts
Given Likes: 21
Points:2,015 EP
#1
08-24-2010, 09:49 AM (This post was last modified: 08-24-2010, 09:58 AM by Grunf.)
Complementary Approaches for Using Ecotoxicity Data in Soil Pollution Evaluation

[Image: 21299075726093887295.jpg]

M. D. Fernandez, J. V. Tarazona - Complementary Approaches for Using Ecotoxicity Data in Soil Pollution Evaluation
Publisher: Nova Science Publishers | 2008-11 | ISBN: 1606921053 | PDF | 81 pages | 5.32 MB


The assessment of soil quality has usually focused on human health protection as the main objective. Recently, criteria for the protection of ecosystems have been incorporated and ecotoxicological analyses are recommended to estimate the risk to ecological receptors associated with contaminants in soils (Calow, 1993; Stephenson et al., 2002; Loibner et al., 2003; Robidoux et al., 2004b). The ecotoxicological assessment of soils is mostly based on the toxicity test with selected organisms. Two complementary approaches are available. The first approach consists in the identification of toxicity thresholds for each relevant pollutant, thresholds that are based on the evaluation of effects of chemical substances on selected organisms representing relevant ecological receptors. The results of these assays are used for setting soil quality standards for each pollutant or pollutant class.Risk assessment tools can be used for this purpose, pre-establishing acceptable levels of risk. The contamination level is based on the comparison of the concentration of contaminants measured in the soil with the standards established from the thresholds. Although field and semi-field information can be incorporated in the higher tier steps, the thresholds are mostly developed from standardised toxicity assays conducted under laboratory conditions following international (e.g. OECD, ISO) or national (e.g. USEPA, ASTM) guidelines. In the second approach, toxicity assays are performed directly with the contaminated media (soil, water, sediment). This alternative, performing the assays with environmental samples, constitutes the method called direct (eco)toxicity assessment (DTA), and is based on modified bioassays.Most regulations have developed soil quality standards based on toxicity assays. However, due to the limitations in the lab to field extrapolation, trends were directed towards the combination of chemical analysis and DTA (Peterson et al., 1990; Torstensson, 1993; Torslov et al., 1997). In this book, both alternatives will be compared. The main difference between both approaches is that in the first case, a reference 'uncontaminated' soil sample is spiked with one or a few chemicals at different concentrations, while in the DTA approach real soil samples are collected at the contaminated site, therefore containing a realistic combination of the different pollutants present in the area, the field sample can be then tested and/or 'diluted' with 'uncontaminated' soil to create a pollution gradient.The toxicity of the spiked or collected/diluted samples is measured and concentration/response relationships obtained in both cases. To understand better this comparison, in this book the term 'toxicity test' will be used for the first approach: toxicity tests with samples spiked at the lab; while the term 'bioassay' will be used for the DTA approach: samples collected at the field.




[Image: Download.png]

Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************




[-] The following 5 users Like xxrr's post:5 users Like xxrr's post
  • kowheng, robertsas, Dell_Brett, Nilupa, kvtasp
 kvtasp

Not-Activated

Afghanistan
User ID: 7690
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 343
Threads: 69
Likes: 2,028 in 379 posts
Given Likes: 791
Points:19,701 EP
#2
01-15-2012, 05:30 PM

[Image: mirror.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


[Image: password.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************

This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator ver 2.1.6




  •
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Process Engineering for Pollution Control and Waste Minimization by Donald L. Wise rendel_© 1 1,222 04-07-2013, 01:12 PM
Last Post: arshiakh
  Air Pollution shadabg 0 689 12-08-2012, 07:28 AM
Last Post: shadabg
  Understanding Environmental Pollution 2nd Edition Marquita K. Hill kvtasp 0 859 01-31-2012, 07:31 AM
Last Post: kvtasp
  Understanding Environmental Pollution 3rd Ed Marquita K. Hill cargadory2k 1 1,135 05-15-2011, 12:54 PM
Last Post: ska51
  FUNDAMENTALS Of AIR POLLUTION ENGINEERING 3fan 0 962 04-27-2011, 12:42 PM
Last Post: 3fan

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode