CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association eBooks Journals, Papers and Presentations Performance of buildings during the 2001 Bhuj earthquake

Performance of buildings during the 2001 Bhuj earthquake
 TAFATNEB

Professional Member

Registered
Algeria
User ID: 29701
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,197
Threads: 830
Likes: 9,403 in 1,160 posts
Given Likes: 2850
Points:118,565 EP
#1
05-10-2014, 10:32 AM
Performance of buildings during the 2001 Bhuj earthquake

Author: Jag Mohan Humar, David Lau, and Jean-Robert Pierre | Size: 4 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | Publisher: Can. J. Civ. Eng. 28: 979–991 (2001) | Year: 2001 | pages: 13

[Image: 60717006044707507433.jpg]


[Image: info.png]

Abstract: The performance of buildings during the January 26, 2001, earthquake in the Kachchh region of the province
of Gujarat in India is discussed. A majority of the buildings in the earthquake region were either of load-bearing masonry
or reinforced concrete framed structure. Most of the masonry buildings were built with random or coursed stone
walls without any reinforcement and heavy clay tile roofing supported on wooden logs. A large number of such buildings
collapsed leading to widespread destruction and loss of life. Many reinforced concrete frame buildings had infill
masonry walls except in the first storey, which was reserved for parking. As would be expected, the open first storey
suffered severe damage or collapsed. Observations of failures confirmed the vulnerability of some structural details that
are known to lead to distress. However, an important observation to come out of the earthquake was that masonry
infills, even when not tied to the surrounding frame, could save the building from collapse, provided such infills are
uniformly distributed throughout the height so that abrupt changes in stiffness and strength did not occur.


[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator v2.2.0



[-] The following 10 users Like TAFATNEB's post:10 users Like TAFATNEB's post
  • ting tsai huang, zrilek, blaze, ruaumoko, jcbv, vardan, malc, subin91, bridgeengineer, levanduy
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  2nd ATC-SEI Conference on Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and RyanRS 0 3,546 10-29-2015, 12:55 AM
Last Post: RyanRS
  Performance based earthquake design using the CPT PinkPant 0 4,302 05-14-2015, 08:17 AM
Last Post: PinkPant
  Earthquake Resistant Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings - Past and Future RyanRS 0 3,976 04-04-2015, 02:50 AM
Last Post: RyanRS
  Performance of elevated tanks in Mw 7.7 Bhuj earthquake of January 26th, 2001 TAFATNEB 0 2,733 05-10-2014, 08:09 AM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Performance Based Earthquake Engineer ing: Application to an Actual Bridge-Foundation TAFATNEB 0 2,885 05-03-2014, 09:06 AM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  1 BUILDING PERFORMANCE IN THE BOUM ERDES, ALGERIA, EARTHQUAKE OF MAY 21, 2003 TAFATNEB 0 2,736 04-26-2014, 01:15 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Guideline for Post-Earthquake Damage Evaluation And Rehabilitation of RC Buildings in TAFATNEB 0 3,021 04-12-2014, 09:38 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode