Development of seismic fragility surfaces for reinforced concrete buildings by means
Current time: 03-24-2018, 08:30 PM
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Author: cve_jule
Last Post: cve_jule
Replies 0
Views 1032

Development of seismic fragility surfaces for reinforced concrete buildings by means
Development of seismic fragility surfaces for reinforced concrete buildings by means of nonlinear time-history analysis

Author: D. M. Seyedi, P. Gehl, J. Douglas, L. Davenne, N. Mezher and S. Ghavamian | Size: 494 KB | Format: PDF | Publisher: EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING AND STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS | Year: 2009 | pages: 18

[Image: 28539644527947299525.jpg]

[Image: info.png]

Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn. 2010; 39:91–108
Published online 3 August 2009 in Wiley InterScience. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.939

Fragility curves are generally developed using a single parameter to relate the level of shaking to the
expected structural damage. The main goal of this work is to use several parameters to characterize the
earthquake ground motion. The fragility curves will, therefore, become surfaces when the ground motion
is represented by two parameters. To this end, the roles of various strong-motion parameters on the induced
damage in the structure are compared through nonlinear time-history numerical calculations. A robust
structural model that can be used to perform numerous nonlinear dynamic calculations, with an acceptable
cost, is adopted. The developed model is based on the use of structural elements with concentrated
nonlinear damage mechanics and plasticity-type behavior. The relations between numerous ground-motion
parameters, characterizing different aspects of the shaking, and the computed damage are analyzed and
discussed. Natural and synthetic accelerograms were chosen/computed based on a consideration of the
magnitude-distance ranges of design earthquakes. A complete methodology for building fragility surfaces
based on the damage calculation through nonlinear numerical analysis of multi-degree-of-freedom systems
is proposed. The fragility surfaces are built to represent the probability that a given damage level is reached
(or exceeded) for any given level of ground motion characterized by the two chosen parameters. The
results show that an increase from one to two ground-motion parameters leads to a significant reduction
in the scatter in the fragility analysis and allows the uncertainties related to the effect of the second
ground-motion parameter to be accounted for within risk assessments.

[Image: Download.png]
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

[-] The following 12 users say Thank You to cve_jule for this post:
  • kowheng, Jackass, oanm2000, yacinesoft, Clouseau, blaze, zrilek, malc, tluc, abouferass88, gulilero, faros3000

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Seismic evaluation of a 56-storey residential reinforced concrete high-rise building anfaga 3 1,785 02-10-2016, 03:49 PM
Last Post: BennyP
Earthquake Resistant Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings - Past and Future RyanRS 0 1,734 04-04-2015, 03:50 AM
Last Post: RyanRS
Seismic performance of concrete frame structures reinforced with superelastic shape TAFATNEB 0 1,413 09-05-2014, 02:59 PM
Control of Seismic Drift Demand for Reinforced Concrete Buildings with Weak First Sto TAFATNEB 0 872 04-26-2014, 06:17 PM
Seismic Drift Demand and Capacity of Non-seismically Designed Concrete Buildings in H TAFATNEB 0 797 04-26-2014, 06:09 PM

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)