CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association eBooks General Books Civil Engineering MSc and PhD thesis HUMAN INDUCED VIBRATIONS ON FOOTBRIDGES Application and comparison of pedestrian load

HUMAN INDUCED VIBRATIONS ON FOOTBRIDGES Application and comparison of pedestrian load
 TAFATNEB

Professional Member

Registered
Algeria
User ID: 29701
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,197
Threads: 830
Likes: 9,403 in 1,160 posts
Given Likes: 2851
Points:118,565 EP
#1
08-08-2014, 04:26 PM (This post was last modified: 08-08-2014, 10:55 PM by oanm2000.)
HUMAN INDUCED VIBRATIONS ON FOOTBRIDGES

Author: Delft University of Technology The Netherlands Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences Department of Design & Construction Section of Structural Engineering Arup Brisbane, Australia Infrastructure, Civil Structures | Size: 18.6 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | Year: 2009 | pages: 140

[Image: 25466995927597650187.png]


[Image: info.png]

The last few decades the community demands for more interesting bridges. Improvements in material properties, design methods, building techniques and the involvement of
architects led to longer and slender footbridges. These bridges tend to be more sensitive to dynamic forces induced by pedestrians, resulting in vibrations of the bridge deck. These vibrations can in some cases attain high proportions, especially when the walking pace of the pedestrians approaches the natural frequency of the bridge. Such a case could result in a situation where the pedestrian feel uncomfortable or even unsafe. This topic has thus become an important issue for the Serviceability Limit State of footbridges.
Some Codes of practice nowadays refer to this topic but it is still a developing field.
Dynamic analyses during the design phase have become inevitable. This report compares and evaluates three load models described in the codes (or proposal for the codes):
Proposal Annex C (to EN 1991-2:2003), the British National Annex (to EN 1991-2:2003) and the Australian Standard (AS 5100.2-2004). All three codes have different approaches to this topic. Proposal Annex C considers walking pedestrians (single and groups) and crowds and represent all of them by non moving harmonic loads. The British National Annex also considers joggers which have total different walking pattern. The fundamental difference with the load models described in Proposal Annex C is that the loads are represented by moving harmonic loads. So does the Australian Code, but this one only considers the model of a single pedestrian.


[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator v2.2.0



[-] The following 12 users Like TAFATNEB's post:12 users Like TAFATNEB's post
  • vardan, slowet, stigtg, jcbv, gulilero, blaze, oanm2000, malc, cace-01, ykhackhack, REYBARN, sacem
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  DYNAMIC BEHAVIOUR OF FOOTBRIDGES SUBJECTED TO PEDESTRIAN-INDUCED VIBRATIONS TAFATNEB 0 781 08-08-2014, 04:32 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode