ASCE TARGETS UNIVERSITY RESEARCHERS FOR “PIRATING” THEIR OWN ARTICLES
Current time: 04-20-2021, 02:48 AM
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Author: Mohammad6299
Last Post: ynopum
Replies 2
Views 2294

ASCE TARGETS UNIVERSITY RESEARCHERS FOR “PIRATING” THEIR OWN ARTICLES
#1
The American Society of Civil Engineers is cracking down on researchers who post their own articles on their personal websites. The publisher, which owns dozens of highly cited journals, claims that the authors commit copyright infringement by sharing their work in public.

One of the core pillars of academic research is sharing. By letting other researchers know what you do, ideas are criticized, improved upon and extended.

Unfortunately it’s not always easy for academics to share their work. Most of the top publications are being monetized by major publishers, which means that they are locked behind a paywall that’s not open to the public.

To make their work easier to access, many researchers host copies of their work on their personal profiles, usually hosted by their university. Interestingly, however, this usually means that they are committing copyright infringement.

This is because most of the top publications ask the authors, who work for free, to sign away all their copyrights if they want their paper to be published.

While many journals allow this type of limited non-commercial infringement by the authors, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) clearly doesn’t. The professional association publishes dozens of journals and during the past few weeks began a crack down on “pirating” researchers.

The publisher has hired the piracy protection firm Digimarc to police the internet for articles that are posted in the wild. As a result, universities all across the globe were targeted with takedown notices, which were also sent to Google in some cases.

The list of rogue researchers is long, and includes professors from MIT, Stanford, Northwestern University, University of Washington, UC Berkeley, University of Michigan, University of Wisconsin–Madison and many international universities.

In the takedown notices Digimarc writes that the publisher has authorized their company “to send DMCA Takedown notices to infringers that illegally post or sell ASCE content.” In other words, ASCE is branding their own authors as pirates because they’re sharing the own work. Below is an example of a takedown notice for a paper written by Ronaldo Borja, Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Stanford.

ASCE takedown notice
[Image: 88647519208764604760.png]

In this case the article is still available on the Stanford website, and Google has also refused to take it out of their search results. The same is true for articles published on the websites of MIT and UC Berkeley. However, there are other universities which have indeed disabled access to the articles in question.

Several articles posted on the websites of the University of Wisconsin–Madison and the University of Texas have disappeared, for example. University of Michigan Professor Radoslaw Michalowski also removed an article that was linked from his list of publications.

The question remains whether ASCE is wise to target their own authors, and the universities who pay them. After all, the publisher relies on these very people to keep its journals filled. In any case, it’s a sad state of affairs for these researchers to put years of hard work into their articles, only to be told they can’t share them with the world.

Source:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************

[-] The following 15 users say Thank You to Mohammad6299 for this post:
  • andersen3, Dell_Brett, rusty, shaker, malc, Ernest0, inge911, carolinandra, ykhackhack, cace-01, ting tsai huang, ErnestoIII, concreteok, ska51, bigone
Reply
#2
Unfortunately, when there is a monopoly, there is a greed.
But no monopoly last forever.
There will be some alternative in the future.
I personally find the way ASCE Codes written is confusing. It makes user jump from one section to other continuously (no need for that)
It can be more compact for certain subjects.
If you are familiar with Beton Kalender, you can see the difference in presenting , introducing the knowledge.
That is my 2 cents
Regards
[-] The following 7 users say Thank You to ykhackhack for this post:
  • cace-01, ErnestoIII, jfjdm, Dell_Brett, concreteok, Mohammad6299, ska51
Reply
#3
That's pity! I agree with you.
There is an easy way: just publish the same article in another "magazine" with slightly different title.
It just shows that ASCE's profit is going down. This is the normal "life-cycle" of any business like this.

Offtopic:
(05-18-2014, 08:47 PM)ykhackhack Wrote: ... with Beton Kalender, you can see the difference ...
I don't want to be offensive, but don't compare Germans with Englishman - there is a huge difference in the brains.
[-] The following 2 users say Thank You to ynopum for this post:
  • ska51, ykhackhack
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
Should supervisors/mentors transfer their knowledge to their researchers freequo 1 1,773 11-12-2012, 05:03 PM
Last Post: avscorreia



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)