CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association eBooks Geotechnical Engineering Foundation & Geotechnics in general FIELD AND LABORATORY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF SPREAD FOOTINGS

FIELD AND LABORATORY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF SPREAD FOOTINGS
 mahyarov

Not-Activated

Iran
User ID: 1197
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 530
Threads: 451
Likes: 3,226 in 534 posts
Given Likes: 1492
Points:47,728 EP
#1
11-12-2012, 09:08 PM
FIELD AND LABORATORY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF SPREAD FOOTINGS

Author: Sargand, S M Hazen, G A | Size: 9.51 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Original preprint | Publisher: Ohio University, Athens | Year: 1999 | pages: 358

[Image: 11189896618981984374.png]


[Image: info.png]

The performance of five highway bridge structures, located in Ohio and supported by spread footings on cohesionless soils or cohesive soils, was monitored in the field throughout construction and under service conditions. The performance of these structures was also examined through centrifuge modeling in the laboratory. Factors used in evaluating these bridges were overall settlement, tilting of abutment walls/pier columns, and pressure distribution under the footings. Field and experimental measurements were then compared against estimates made by selected geotechnical methods. None of the spread footings in these five bridge structures experienced an average settlement of more than 2 in. (5 cm) prior to service load application. Contact pressure monitored at the footing/bearing soil interface in the field remained less than 40 psi (276 kPa) and was generally close to the theoretical estimate. Poorer agreement resulted between the measured and predicted abutment wall tilting. None of the six geotechnical methods for predicting settlement of footings on cohesionless soils was accurate in all cases. The method proposed by Hough appeared to be the best. Standard methods used to estimate immediate and time dependent consolidation settlements were reasonably accurate when compared to field data. Centrifuge testing techniques provided settlement results superior to those predicted by any of the six geotechnical methods. One limitation of centrifuge testing, however, is the simulation of complex subsurface conditions in the laboratory.

[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator ver 2.1.6



[-] The following 9 users Like mahyarov's post:9 users Like mahyarov's post
  • ISTRAKTURA, Evandrojr, kowheng, utan, oanm2000, Dell_Brett, chenamoy, Grunf, zrilek
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Geotechnical Instrumentation for Monitoring Field Performance toa011 3 2,624 03-16-2016, 09:10 AM
Last Post: ssobhan
  ASTM STP1014: Vane Shear Strength Testing in Soils: Field and Laboratory Studies hich 3 2,383 03-21-2015, 11:55 AM
Last Post: PinkPant
  LARGE SCALE LOAD TESTS AND DATA BASE OF SPREAD FOOTINGS ON SAND mahyarov 0 742 11-12-2012, 09:12 PM
Last Post: mahyarov
  Engineering Policy Guidelines For Design Of Spread Footings mahyarov 1 1,034 10-30-2012, 05:39 AM
Last Post: shadabg
  USDOT: Selection of Spread Footings on Soils to Support Highway Bridge Structures cargadory2k 0 1,092 09-04-2010, 07:59 PM
Last Post: cargadory2k

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode