CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association eBooks Structural Books Concrete Durability Evaluation of Post-Tensioned Concrete Beam Specimens after Long-Term Aggre

Durability Evaluation of Post-Tensioned Concrete Beam Specimens after Long-Term Aggre
 mahyarov

Not-Activated

Iran
User ID: 1197
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 530
Threads: 451
Likes: 3,226 in 534 posts
Given Likes: 1492
Points:47,728 EP
#1
11-10-2012, 03:25 PM
Durability Evaluation of Post-Tensioned Concrete Beam Specimens after Long-Term Aggressive Exposure Testing

Author: Turco, G P | Size: 4.24 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Original preprint | Publisher: University of Texas, Austin | Year: 2007 | pages: 174

[Image: 75797279254339915633.png]


[Image: info.png]

This report focuses on the forensic analysis and evaluation of large-scale post-tensioned beam specimens after nearly 8 years of extremely aggressive exposure testing. The research was funded jointly by both the Federal Highway Administration and the Texas Department of Transportation. The relationship between durability performance and the following variables was evaluated in this study: level of applied load and initial cracking, level of prestress, duct type, strand type, grout type, grouting method, use of encapsulated system for anchorage protection, and galvanized duct splice type. In addition, the applicability of half-cell potentials and chloride penetration tests for evaluating the likelihood of corrosion was examined. Major findings were: 1) Mixed reinforcement (also known as partial prestressing) performed poorly from a durability standpoint. Only fully prestressed beams offered better durability performance than those which were not prestressed at all. 2) Corrugated steel galvanized ducts performed very poorly. Large holes were found in the ducts, and in some cases several inches of the ducts completely corroded away. 3) Corrugated plastic ducts offer better performance as long as they are "robust." 4) Non-flowfilled epoxy coated strand and galvanized strand offered no significant improvement in long-term durability over conventional strand. 5) Installing plastic caps over anchorheads rather than just filling the anchorage pocket with nonshrink grout increases the long-term durability of the anchorage.

[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator ver 2.1.6



[-] The following 5 users Like mahyarov's post:5 users Like mahyarov's post
  • kowheng, sodapas, Jackass, Dell_Brett, blaze
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Durability of Reinforced Concrete Structures Dobblo 0 649 04-13-2020, 04:38 PM
Last Post: Dobblo
  Guide to Long-Span Concrete Floors rendel_© 1 1,787 02-17-2020, 02:36 PM
Last Post: malee
  Performance Criteria for Concrete Durability pezhmankhan 1 1,297 09-03-2019, 05:45 AM
Last Post: kowheng
  Post-Tensioned Concrete: Principles and Practice, Third Edition carolinandra 1 1,313 07-01-2019, 09:19 PM
Last Post: hodzicemir
  NONLINEAR RESPONSE OF A POST-TENSIONED CONCRETE STRUCTURE mowafi3m 1 1,445 05-21-2019, 06:29 AM
Last Post: kowheng
  Concrete Durability: A Practical Guide to the Design of Durable Concrete Structures carolinandra 1 1,021 05-01-2019, 03:06 AM
Last Post: kowheng
  Non-Destructive Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Structures: vol 1 & 2 ir_71 4 2,355 04-16-2018, 01:30 PM
Last Post: scorpion07

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode