CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association eBooks Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Seismic Performance of an I-Girder to Inverted-T Bent Cap Connection

Seismic Performance of an I-Girder to Inverted-T Bent Cap Connection
 mahyarov

Not-Activated

Iran
User ID: 1197
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 530
Threads: 451
Likes: 3,226 in 534 posts
Given Likes: 1492
Points:47,728 EP
#1
10-27-2012, 01:43 PM
Seismic Performance of an I-Girder to Inverted-T Bent Cap Connection

Author: Snyder, Rick Vander Werff, J R Thiemann, Zach Sritharan, Sri | Size: 10.83 MB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | Publisher: Iowa State University, Ames | Year: 2011 | pages: 306

[Image: 13838199451541364785.png]


[Image: info.png]

California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) current design practice assumes that connections between precast I-girders and inverted-T bent caps will degrade in a seismic event, making the precast girder option for seismic bridges inefficient. A prototype I-girder to inverted-T bent cap bridge and a 50% scale test unit was designed in order to investigate the behavior of the as-built girder-to-cap connection region. Analysis of test results shows that the current I-girder to inverted-T bent cap bridge connection is capable of acting as a fully continuous connection for both positive and negative moments during both gravity and seismic loading, contrary to the design assumptions stated in Caltrans’ Seismic Design Criteria. The improved connection detail demonstrated the ability to ensure a fully continuous moment connection between the I-girders and inverted-T bent cap. Both connection details also exhibited a significant moment resistance beyond what was expected during the vertical load test although the as-built connection eventually failed under positive moments at moderate to large displacements.

[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator ver 2.1.6



[-] The following 3 users Like mahyarov's post:3 users Like mahyarov's post
  â€˘ cace-01, kowheng, sodapas
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Performance-Based Seismic Design for Tall Buildings pezhmankhan 2 1,006 10-06-2021, 05:00 AM
Last Post: poolmand
  TBI: Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Tall Buildings pezhmankhan 1 1,945 05-11-2019, 03:49 AM
Last Post: kowheng
  Seismic Isolation, Structural Health Monitoring, and Performance Based Seismic Desig carolinandra 0 931 01-16-2019, 03:14 PM
Last Post: carolinandra
  Performance-Based Seismic Design of Concrete Structures and Infrastructures amindoxiti 0 945 03-23-2018, 12:57 PM
Last Post: amindoxiti
  fib B68 - Probabilistic Performance-Based Seismic Design xnr09 2 1,253 07-24-2017, 07:20 AM
Last Post: xnr09
  Smart Connection Systems: Design and Seismic Analysis subin91 3 1,609 03-01-2017, 05:47 PM
Last Post: Veggeta
  Role of Seismic Testing Facilities in Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering bridgeengineer 0 751 04-19-2016, 07:38 PM
Last Post: bridgeengineer

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode