CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association eBooks Journals, Papers and Presentations Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCPT) for Subgrade Assessment

Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCPT) for Subgrade Assessment
 shadabg

Professional Member

Subscriber
India
User ID: 27905
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,749
Threads: 166
Likes: 8,553 in 1,623 posts
Given Likes: 3737
Points:66,329 EP
#1
09-18-2012, 06:18 AM
Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DCPT) for Subgrade Assessment

Author: Salgado, Rodrigo and Yoon, Sungmin | Size: 780 KB | Format: PDF | Quality: Original preprint | Publisher: Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. | Year: 2003 | pages: 109

[Image: 28457356366664844537.jpg]


[Image: info.png]

TRB Subject Code:62-7 Soil Foundation Subgrades
Publication No.: FHWA/IN/JTRP-2002/30, SPR-2362

In-situ penetration tests have been widely used in geotechnical and foundation engineering for site investigation in support of analysis and design. The standard penetration test (SPT) and the cone penetration test (CPT) are two typical in-situ penetration tests. The dynamic cone penetration test shows features of both the CPT and the SPT. The DCPT is similar to the SPT in test. It is performed by dropping a hammer from a certain fall height and measuring a penetration depth per blow for each tested depth. The shape of the dynamic cone is similar to that of the penetrometer used in the CPT. In road construction, there is a need to assess the adequacy of the subgrade to behave satisfactorily beneath a pavement. A recently completed Joint Transportation Research Program project showed that the DCPT can be used to evaluate the mechanical properties of compacted subgrade soils. In the present implementation project, the application of the DCPT is further investigated.

Present practice in determining the adequacy of a compacted subgrade is to determine the dry density and water content by the sand-cone method or with a nuclear gauge. However, the use of the resilient modulus (Mr) has become mandatory for pavement design. To find the Mr, a time consuming testing procedure is required which demands significant effort. Therefore a faster and easier alternative for compaction control in road construction practice is desired. To this end, the present project aimed to take a first step in the generation of data to create appropriate correlations among subgrade parameters and DCPT results.

The present research project consists of field testing, laboratory testing, and analysis of the results. The field testing includes the DCPT and nuclear gauge tests. In the planning stage, several road construction sites were selected for the field testing. For the selected road construction sites, both the DCPT and nuclear tests were performed at the same location, allowing a comparison between DCPT and nuclear test results. Soil samples for the selected project sites were also obtained for the laboratory testing program.

[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


[Image: mirror.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator ver 2.1.6
Regards,
Shadab

"Dream till you Live, Chase till you Die"



[-] The following 5 users Like shadabg's post:5 users Like shadabg's post
  • kowheng, utan, Evandrojr, cace-01, zrilek
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Comparative Study of Methods of Determination of Coefficient of Subgrade Reaction gulilero 0 2,789 08-15-2014, 02:54 AM
Last Post: gulilero
  Comparison of Static and Dynamic Pushover Analysis in Assessment of the Target Displa TAFATNEB 0 3,274 08-10-2014, 02:42 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  SEISMIC ASSESSMENT OF AN IRREGULAR THREE-STOREY FULL SCA LE RC TEST STRUCTURE WITH SU TAFATNEB 0 3,222 06-03-2014, 09:11 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  STRUCTURAL DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF BUILDING STRUCTURES USING DYNAMIC EXPERIMENTAL DATA asim99 0 3,348 12-31-2012, 02:00 AM
Last Post: asim99
  Dynamic stiffness of foundation on layered soil half-space using cone frustums mybest 0 3,911 09-19-2012, 02:51 PM
Last Post: mybest
  EVALUATION OF BEARING CAPACITY OF PILES FROM CONE PENETRATION TEST DATA shadabg 0 3,603 09-18-2012, 06:32 AM
Last Post: shadabg
  Guideline for Subgrade Reinforcement with Geosynthetics ir_71 0 3,179 06-01-2011, 04:32 PM
Last Post: ir_71

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode