CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association Various Free Discussion Normalized Axial force by EC8

Normalized Axial force by EC8
 giga

Not-Activated

White-private
User ID: 1491
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 138
Threads: 44
Likes: 381 in 101 posts
Given Likes: 1391
Points:7,265 EP
#1
03-05-2011, 12:36 AM
Hi
My question have to concern with normalized axial force by EC into columns

Under thew desired ductility conditions EC require this conditions


ni=Ned/(Ac*fcd) <= 0.55 for DCH ... 1
ni=Ned/(Ac*fcd) <= 0.65 for DCM ... 2
ni=Ned/(Ac*fcd) <= 0.75 for DCL .... 3


Where Ned is axial force ( kN for ex.) given from seismical situations.

My question is
Which value of Axial force must be included in equations 1,2, and 3
N = Ng+0.3NP+Ns or N = 1.35Ng+1.5Np
Or equations 1,2,3 must be checked with both values of axial forces
Any reference or any example would be helpfull,

Regards
z.g.



[-] The following 1 user Likes giga's post:1 user Likes giga's post
  • DamirDz
 rigid_joint

Senior Member

Registered
Jamaica
User ID: 6110
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 243
Threads: 16
Likes: 333 in 122 posts
Given Likes: 244
Points:8,861 EP
#2
03-05-2011, 01:43 AM
Quote:N = Ng+0.3NP+Ns
this value



[-] The following 3 users Like rigid_joint's post:3 users Like rigid_joint's post
  • theanhpe, giga, DamirDz
 giga

Not-Activated

White-private
User ID: 1491
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 138
Threads: 44
Likes: 381 in 101 posts
Given Likes: 1391
Points:7,265 EP
#3
03-05-2011, 09:39 AM
dear Rigid_Joint

Thanks for reply

any reference or any example if you have would bee very helpfull.

I agree to you that the axial force should be taken from seismic design situations
(Ng+0.3Np+Ns), but i have seen in some books that is taken 1.35Ng+1.5Np, and this have confused mee very much.

One reference book in which the author use N = 1.35Ng+1.5Np and Ng+0.3Np+Ns, is book of author Jure Radiq - Betonske Konstrukcije - ( is in croatian Language).

Regards
z.g.




  •
 rigid_joint

Senior Member

Registered
Jamaica
User ID: 6110
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 243
Threads: 16
Likes: 333 in 122 posts
Given Likes: 244
Points:8,861 EP
#4
03-05-2011, 09:46 AM
the one and only right combination is the Ng+0.3q+Nseismic.




  •
 giga

Not-Activated

White-private
User ID: 1491
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 138
Threads: 44
Likes: 381 in 101 posts
Given Likes: 1391
Points:7,265 EP
#5
03-05-2011, 05:26 PM
because is related with seismic design situation
which value of Gamac should be used for calculating of fcd.




  •
 DamirDz

Not-Activated

White-private
User ID: 5785
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 162
Threads: 47
Likes: 393 in 111 posts
Given Likes: 626
Points:10,143 EP
#6
03-05-2011, 05:51 PM
Dear giga, i would advise you not to take to much reference from the Jure Radic book, one example being this you mentioned here. I had the same doubt a while ago just because of that book.

One other reference i can come up with now is the El Ghazouli (don't know the exact spelling) book on EC8 which you can find here on the forum.

Best regards!

DamirDz



[-] The following 1 user Likes DamirDz's post:1 user Likes DamirDz's post
  • giga
 rigid_joint

Senior Member

Registered
Jamaica
User ID: 6110
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 243
Threads: 16
Likes: 333 in 122 posts
Given Likes: 244
Points:8,861 EP
#7
03-05-2011, 08:19 PM
Quote:which value of Gamac should be used for calculating of fcd.
γc=1.5




  •
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode