[REQUEST] ASCE-ACI 426 (1973)

[pontiac]

Dear Collegues,
I need the code ASCE-ACI 426 (1973).
Thanks in advance

[parhyang]

ASCE-ACI Committee 426 (1973). “The shear strength of reinforced concrete members”,

is old and it may need someone to scans if they have, how about newer editions?

ACI-ASCE Committee 445 (1999) "Recent Approaches to Shear Design of Structural Concrete"

Design procedures proposed for regulatory standards should be safe, correct in concept, simple to understand, and should not necessarily add to either design or construction costs. These procedures are most effective if they are based on relatively simple conceptual models rather than on complex empirical equations. This report introduces design engineers to some approaches for the shear design of one-way structural concrete members. Although the approaches explained in the subsequent chapters of this report are relatively new, some of them have reached a sufficiently mature state that they have been implemented in codes of practice.
This report builds upon the landmark state-of-the-art report by the ASCE-ACI Committee 426 (1973), The Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Members, which reviewed the large body of experimental work on shear and gave the background to many of the current American Concrete Institute (ACI) shear design provisions. After reviewing the many different empirical equations for shear design, Committee 426 expressed in 1973 the hope that “the design regulations for shear strength can be integrated, simplified, and given a physical significance so that designers can approach unusual design problems in a rational manner.”

download links,

Code:

***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************

[pontiac]

Dear parhyang,
Thank you for your interest. You are right, this one is new and may be better but I need 1973 edition because some points about several subjects are still not clear and 1973 edition has different approaches and challenges.
Thanks for your reply anyway