CivilEA.com
  • Subscribe !
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
Civil Engineering Association eBooks Journals, Papers and Presentations Performance of elevated tanks in Mw 7.7 Bhuj earthquake of January 26th, 2001

Performance of elevated tanks in Mw 7.7 Bhuj earthquake of January 26th, 2001
 TAFATNEB

Professional Member

Registered
Algeria
User ID: 29701
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,197
Threads: 830
Likes: 9,403 in 1,160 posts
Given Likes: 2850
Points:118,565 EP
#1
05-10-2014, 08:09 AM
Performance of elevated tanks in Mw 7.7 Bhuj earthquake of January 26th, 2001

Author: Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Earth Planet. Sci.), 112, No. 3, September 2003, pp. 421{429 | Size: 988 KB | Format: PDF | Quality: Unspecified | Publisher: Durgesh C Rai Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur 208 016, India. | Year: 2013 | pages: 09

[Image: 66245375706001941736.jpg]


[Image: info.png]

The current designs of supporting structures of elevated water tanks are extremely vulnerable under lateral forces due to an earthquake and the Bhuj earthquake provided another illustration when a great many water tank stagings su ered damage and a few collapsed. The more popular shaft type stagings su er from poor ductility of thin shell sections besides low redundancy and toughness whereas framed stagings consist of weak members and poor brace-column joints. A strength analysis of a few damaged shaft type stagings clearly shows that all of them either met or exceeded the strength requirements of IS:1893{1984, however, they were all found de cient when compared with requirements of the International Building Code. IS:1893{1984 is unjusti ably low for these systems which do not have the advantage of ductility and redundancy and are currently being underestimated at least by a factor of 3 and need an upward revision of forces immediately.


[Image: download.png]
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************


This post has been made by CivilEA Post-Generator v2.2.0



[-] The following 6 users Like TAFATNEB's post:6 users Like TAFATNEB's post
  • vardan, slowet, ting tsai huang, zrilek, malc, cristi
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Performance based earthquake design using the CPT PinkPant 0 4,300 05-14-2015, 08:17 AM
Last Post: PinkPant
  Performance of buildings during the 2001 Bhuj earthquake TAFATNEB 0 2,976 05-10-2014, 10:32 AM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Performance Based Earthquake Engineer ing: Application to an Actual Bridge-Foundation TAFATNEB 0 2,884 05-03-2014, 09:06 AM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  1 BUILDING PERFORMANCE IN THE BOUM ERDES, ALGERIA, EARTHQUAKE OF MAY 21, 2003 TAFATNEB 0 2,735 04-26-2014, 01:15 PM
Last Post: TAFATNEB
  Hypothetical Earthquake Ground Shaking Estimation for Performance-Based Design benny 4 6,947 02-14-2013, 10:58 PM
Last Post: arshiakh
  Adapting earthquake actions in Eurocode 8 for performance-based seismic design cve_jule 0 3,429 09-09-2011, 07:18 AM
Last Post: cve_jule
  Construction Today Magazine January 2011</DIV> Milkshake 0 3,654 01-19-2011, 04:40 AM
Last Post: Milkshake

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread

Designed by CivilEA - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode