Civil Engineering Association
[REQUEST] Ultimate Strength of Nonrectangular Structural Concrete Members - ACI Journal - Printable Version

+- Civil Engineering Association (https://forum.civilea.com)
+-- Forum: eBooks (https://forum.civilea.com/forum-63.html)
+--- Forum: Books, Codes, Theses, Journals & Papers Request (https://forum.civilea.com/forum-55.html)
+---- Forum: Theses, Journals and Papers Request (https://forum.civilea.com/forum-153.html)
+---- Thread: [REQUEST] Ultimate Strength of Nonrectangular Structural Concrete Members - ACI Journal (/thread-54794.html)



Ultimate Strength of Nonrectangular Structural Concrete Members - ACI Journal - dixz_on - 01-20-2018

I'm looking for an article titled "Ultimate Strength of Nonrectangular Structural Concrete Members" published in ACI Journal.
  • Author(s): Alan H. Mattock and Ladislav B. Kriz
    Publication: Journal Proceedings
    Volume: 57
    Issue: 1
    Appears on pages(s): 737-766
Regards...


RE: Ultimate Strength of Nonrectangular Structural Concrete Members - ACI Journal - xnr09 - 01-20-2018

Hi
Here it is
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:

http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************
cheers
xnr09


RE: Ultimate Strength of Nonrectangular Structural Concrete Members - ACI Journal - dixz_on - 01-23-2018

thanks


RE: Ultimate Strength of Nonrectangular Structural Concrete Members - ACI Journal - amindoxiti - 01-23-2018

(01-23-2018, 05:57 PM)dixz_on Wrote: thanks

Have you seen the third rule of the civilea rules during these nine years?


RE: Ultimate Strength of Nonrectangular Structural Concrete Members - ACI Journal - BennyP - 01-23-2018

Well, is not the first time. The previous post where he forgot the third rule was longer than this thanks and the warn was for spam. Now is short but the warning will be for repeating the same fault so is bigger.
We always appreciate users doing nothing during nine years more than the majority doing nothing in a shorter time.