02-03-2011, 05:35 AM
02-03-2011, 07:13 AM
You can visit ZWSOFT page,
Zwsoft Comparison ZWcad vs AutoCad
in the link above there is a comparison table with features that are supported and not supported
Moderator Notes:
You got 3 warning (included this). You're still posting transparent link. For your next transparent link, your posting privilege will be suspended until you can show me/moderators that you can post the right code protected links (by posting on my profile comments or e-mail to me).
Zwsoft Comparison ZWcad vs AutoCad
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************
in the link above there is a comparison table with features that are supported and not supported
Moderator Notes:
You got 3 warning (included this). You're still posting transparent link. For your next transparent link, your posting privilege will be suspended until you can show me/moderators that you can post the right code protected links (by posting on my profile comments or e-mail to me).
02-03-2011, 07:50 AM
Experiments users reports that ZwCAD isn't full similar as Autodesk AutoCAD, and does not display the high degree of similarity as advertising does believe!
The main complaints are:
1- Not fully compatible with AutoLISP routines and some third part software;
2- Very slow response time of a few commands (could be irritant for experienced users);
3- Some incompatibilities and crashes when importing some complex Autodesk AutoCAD original drawing;
4- Does not exports a true Autodesk AutoCAD compatibility drawing.
The main advantage is the cheapest price.
For regular users, predominantly for those who ready-only or for those working on designs with low complexity, is a very plausible option!
Regards
See post below to portable 2011 version:
The main complaints are:
1- Not fully compatible with AutoLISP routines and some third part software;
2- Very slow response time of a few commands (could be irritant for experienced users);
3- Some incompatibilities and crashes when importing some complex Autodesk AutoCAD original drawing;
4- Does not exports a true Autodesk AutoCAD compatibility drawing.
The main advantage is the cheapest price.
For regular users, predominantly for those who ready-only or for those working on designs with low complexity, is a very plausible option!
Regards
See post below to portable 2011 version:
Code:
***************************************
Content of this section is hidden, You must be registered and activate your account to see this content. See this link to read how you can remove this limitation:
http://forum.civilea.com/thread-27464.html
***************************************
02-03-2011, 07:55 AM
i find it very stable and not slow at all. Instead autocad can be sometimes very heavy depending on the system.
The lisp compatibility is kind of a prob though
The lisp compatibility is kind of a prob though
02-03-2011, 09:47 AM
Its mean no more advantage of ZwCAD.
AUTO CAD is best every where and every time.
AUTO CAD is best every where and every time.
02-03-2011, 03:51 PM
Hello,
We bought some licenses about a year ago to try it out and it has been so far a good investment. The complete version price is about half the price of what you pay for AUTOCAD “Light” version. It's worth giving a try.
Regards,
We bought some licenses about a year ago to try it out and it has been so far a good investment. The complete version price is about half the price of what you pay for AUTOCAD “Light” version. It's worth giving a try.
Regards,